Fracture Resistance of High Strength Steel Welds in Gaseous Hydrogen Determined Using Potential Difference and Unloading Compliance

Abstract High-strength ferritic steels are widely used in the current hydrogen infrastructure for the construction of seamless and welded high-pressure vessels. In mobility applications (such as refueling stations), hydrogen is stored in the gaseous state at high pressures (typically between, 500 bar and 1000 bar for refilling of fuel cell vehicles), and seamless vessels are currently the only viable solution. To lower emissions in emerging and hard-to-abate industries, hydrogen storage is expected at lower pressures (up to 350 bar) but in much larger volumes. In this scenario, large, welded vessels are required. The fracture toughness of these welds in hydrogen is a primary concern, as welding is known to produce microstructural and property gradients across the joint, potentially resulting in highly variable fracture resistance. In a previous work, the fracture resistance of welds fabricated from a high strength, EN 10216-3 grade P690 QL2 steel was investigated [1], showing greatly reduced fracture resistance due to the presence of local hard spots in the heat affected zone. This current work complements previous work with new fracture results for welds in gaseous hydrogen at pressure of 200 bar. Tests were conducted under rising displacement conditions as per ASTM E1820 standard [2], similar to the previous study, except that the crack extension was monitored with (single-specimen) potential difference measurements for comparison to the previous study using unloading compliance. While the J-integral resistance curve can be determined by both methods, the potential difference method, when properly implemented, can resolve the initiation of crack extension more precisely than the unloading-compliance technique, but the potential difference method is more difficult to implement and interpret. Additionally, displacement rate effects were investigated and compared between the two methods for crack-extension monitoring. The advantages and appropriateness of each test methodology are discussed in the context of structural integrity of welded pressure vessels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2025-154490
Primary Topic
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fracture Resistance of High Strength Steel Welds in Gaseous Hydrogen Determined Using Potential Difference and Unloading Compliance

Joseph Ronevich, Matthew Connolly, Zachary Buck, Christopher W. San Marchi et al.
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
article

Fracture Resistance of High Strength Steel Welds in Gaseous Hydrogen Determined Using Potential Difference and Unloading Compliance

Joseph Ronevich, Matthew Connolly, Zachary Buck, Christopher W. San Marchi, Paolo Bortot, M. Bellingardi, Matteo Ortolani
article en

Abstract

Abstract High-strength ferritic steels are widely used in the current hydrogen infrastructure for the construction of seamless and welded high-pressure vessels. In mobility applications (such as refueling stations), hydrogen is stored in the gaseous state at high pressures (typically between, 500 bar and 1000 bar for refilling of fuel cell vehicles), and seamless vessels are currently the only viable solution. To lower emissions in emerging and hard-to-abate industries, hydrogen storage is expected at lower pressures (up to 350 bar) but in much larger volumes. In this scenario, large, welded vessels are required. The fracture toughness of these welds in hydrogen is a primary concern, as welding is known to produce microstructural and property gradients across the joint, potentially resulting in highly variable fracture resistance. In a previous work, the fracture resistance of welds fabricated from a high strength, EN 10216-3 grade P690 QL2 steel was investigated [1], showing greatly reduced fracture resistance due to the presence of local hard spots in the heat affected zone. This current work complements previous work with new fracture results for welds in gaseous hydrogen at pressure of 200 bar. Tests were conducted under rising displacement conditions as per ASTM E1820 standard [2], similar to the previous study, except that the crack extension was monitored with (single-specimen) potential difference measurements for comparison to the previous study using unloading compliance. While the J-integral resistance curve can be determined by both methods, the potential difference method, when properly implemented, can resolve the initiation of crack extension more precisely than the unloading-compliance technique, but the potential difference method is more difficult to implement and interpret. Additionally, displacement rate effects were investigated and compared between the two methods for crack-extension monitoring. The advantages and appropriateness of each test methodology are discussed in the context of structural integrity of welded pressure vessels.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), Tenaris (United States) (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.