Challenges in Standardizing Additive Manufacturing for Nuclear Components and Associated Material Testing II) a Statistical Approach to Material Specification Values and Procedures Qualification Methods for Additive Manufactured 316 L Stainless Steel

Abstract Additive Manufacturing (AM) is expected to play a significant role in various situations, such as the addition of high functionality to component by applying complex shapes that cannot be processed with conventional manufacturing methods, rationalization of production by applying of an integrated structure with decreasing parts number and realizing a quick parts supply in case of trouble. With the aim of standardization of Type316L stainless steel produced by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), material tests were conducted on AM materials that were fabricated by four different nuclear component manufacturers using their own independent conditions (different AM equipment, powder, process parameter and heat treatment) and evaluations included statistical analysis were performed based on the acquired data to investigate rational methods of procedure qualification and the appropriateness of referencing conventional material standard values. The tensile test samples were built throughout the entire building volume of the L-PBF equipment, and then subjected to heat treatment and specimen processing. The specimens were conducted on non-destructive testing and tensile testing was conducted at room temperature. As a result of the evaluation, it was confirmed that there was a difference in tensile properties at the upstream and downstream sides of the gas flow in the equipment. In addition, A-basis was calculated from the acquired data, and it was suggested that the AM material had characteristics equivalent to or better than the conventional Type 316L material standard values. Furthermore, the relationship between the number of tensile test specimens and A-basis was evaluated, and the standard requirements for tensile testing were examined to ensure material quality in the procedure qualification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2025-153454
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges in Standardizing Additive Manufacturing for Nuclear Components and Associated Material Testing II) a Statistical Approach to Material Specification Values and Procedures Qualification Methods for Additive Manufactured 316 L Stainless Steel

Shinobu Okido, Atsushi Mori, Makoto Nakajima, Tomonori Abe et al.
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Challenges in Standardizing Additive Manufacturing for Nuclear Components and Associated Material Testing II) a Statistical Approach to Material Specification Values and Procedures Qualification Methods for Additive Manufactured 316 L Stainless Steel

Shinobu Okido, Atsushi Mori, Makoto Nakajima, Tomonori Abe, Hisashi Matsuoka, Yoshinori Katayama
article en

Abstract

Abstract Additive Manufacturing (AM) is expected to play a significant role in various situations, such as the addition of high functionality to component by applying complex shapes that cannot be processed with conventional manufacturing methods, rationalization of production by applying of an integrated structure with decreasing parts number and realizing a quick parts supply in case of trouble. With the aim of standardization of Type316L stainless steel produced by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), material tests were conducted on AM materials that were fabricated by four different nuclear component manufacturers using their own independent conditions (different AM equipment, powder, process parameter and heat treatment) and evaluations included statistical analysis were performed based on the acquired data to investigate rational methods of procedure qualification and the appropriateness of referencing conventional material standard values. The tensile test samples were built throughout the entire building volume of the L-PBF equipment, and then subjected to heat treatment and specimen processing. The specimens were conducted on non-destructive testing and tensile testing was conducted at room temperature. As a result of the evaluation, it was confirmed that there was a difference in tensile properties at the upstream and downstream sides of the gas flow in the equipment. In addition, A-basis was calculated from the acquired data, and it was suggested that the AM material had characteristics equivalent to or better than the conventional Type 316L material standard values. Furthermore, the relationship between the number of tensile test specimens and A-basis was evaluated, and the standard requirements for tensile testing were examined to ensure material quality in the procedure qualification.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Germany) (DE), Toshiba (Japan) (JP), IHI Corporation (United States) (US), IHI Corporation (United Kingdom) (GB), IHI Corporation (Czechia) (CZ), Hitachi (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.