A 10-year Retrospective Study on Full-Arch Implant Prostheses: Comparison of Ceramic and Toronto Bridges
Both full-arch ceramic prostheses and Toronto bridges proved to be reliable rehabilitation strategies over 10 years. Fractures were more common in ceramic restorations, while detachments prevailed in Toronto bridges. Ceramic prostheses showed higher survival rates, especially in the maxilla. Overall, long-term success rates were comparable between the two treatments.
Authors
- Roberto Crespi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2103-2103)
- Georgios E. Romanos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-5957)
- Giovanni Battista Menchini-Fabris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-0160)
- Paolo Toti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1214-5886)
- Giovanni Crespi
Publication Details
- Journal
- The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
- Published
- 2025-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11542
- Primary Topic
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00