Bridging the AI governance gap: Evaluating the effectiveness of transparency tools and ethics boards in multinational firms

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming innovation and competitiveness in multinational corporations, yet its rapid adoption has outpaced the development of effective governance mechanisms. This study investigates the “Generative AI Governance Paradox”, the tension between fostering innovation and ensuring transparency, accountability, and regulatory compliance. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research evaluates the effectiveness of transparency tools (e.g., explainable AI, third-party audits, model documentation) and ethical oversight structures (e.g., AI ethics boards) in mitigating governance risks. Qualitative interviews with 30 governance experts and a quantitative survey of 150 multinational firms reveal that organizations combining explainable AI with empowered ethics boards experience significantly fewer governance failures. Specifically, these firms report 48% fewer instances of bias and regulatory violations, and 35% fewer regulatory investigations when third-party audits are employed. However, ethics boards with only advisory roles showed limited impact. The study emphasizes that real effectiveness stems from the integration of these tools into core decision-making processes, supported by leadership commitment and an ethical culture. The findings underscore the need for robust governance practices, executive authority in oversight structures, and the institutionalization of ethics in AI deployment. Future research should explore sector-specific governance models and emerging technologies for enhancing AI accountability at scale.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22495/cgiop4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the AI governance gap: Evaluating the effectiveness of transparency tools and ethics boards in multinational firms

Ryosuke Nakajima
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Bridging the AI governance gap: Evaluating the effectiveness of transparency tools and ethics boards in multinational firms

Ryosuke Nakajima
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming innovation and competitiveness in multinational corporations, yet its rapid adoption has outpaced the development of effective governance mechanisms. This study investigates the “Generative AI Governance Paradox”, the tension between fostering innovation and ensuring transparency, accountability, and regulatory compliance. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research evaluates the effectiveness of transparency tools (e.g., explainable AI, third-party audits, model documentation) and ethical oversight structures (e.g., AI ethics boards) in mitigating governance risks. Qualitative interviews with 30 governance experts and a quantitative survey of 150 multinational firms reveal that organizations combining explainable AI with empowered ethics boards experience significantly fewer governance failures. Specifically, these firms report 48% fewer instances of bias and regulatory violations, and 35% fewer regulatory investigations when third-party audits are employed. However, ethics boards with only advisory roles showed limited impact. The study emphasizes that real effectiveness stems from the integration of these tools into core decision-making processes, supported by leadership commitment and an ethical culture. The findings underscore the need for robust governance practices, executive authority in oversight structures, and the institutionalization of ethics in AI deployment. Future research should explore sector-specific governance models and emerging technologies for enhancing AI accountability at scale.

Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.