Balancing Polysulfide Distribution in “Anode‐Free” Lithium–Sulfide Batteries

Lithium-sulfide positive electrodes represent a promising alternative to established transition metal-based positive electrodes due to enhanced specific capacity and sustainability. While positive electrodes containing elemental sulfur require a lithiated negative electrode, lithium-sulfide can serve as the lithium reservoir and thus be paired with bare copper electrodes in "anode-free" or "zero-excess" cell concepts. This boosts energy density and avoids handling of thin lithium metal electrodes. While promising electrochemical performance of "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries has already been demonstrated, many reported cell configurations rely on nickel- instead of copper-based negative electrodes, undermining the enhanced sustainability bestowed by lithium-sulfide positive electrodes. Demonstrating a continuous reaction between copper electrodes and soluble polysulfide species, two approaches are evaluated that restrict the migration of polysulfide species. While both, in situ polymerization of an electrolyte additive as well as electrospinning of a polymer layer at negative electrodes, enable reversible operation of copper-based "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries, the former approach offers notably enhanced capacity retention. Counterintuitively, the quantification of polysulfide distribution throughout the individual battery components reveals less confinement within the positive electrode as beneficial for the overall reversibility. This demonstrates that a balance between positive and negative electrode reversibility is required to advance "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemSusChem
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202501104
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Polysulfide Distribution in “Anode‐Free” Lithium–Sulfide Batteries

Martin Winter, Isidora Cekić-Lasković, Gunther Brunklaus, Stefan Kaskel et al.
1 citations
ChemSusChem
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
0.73
article

Balancing Polysulfide Distribution in “Anode‐Free” Lithium–Sulfide Batteries

Martin Winter, Isidora Cekić-Lasković, Gunther Brunklaus, Stefan Kaskel, Bärbel Tengen, Tom Boenke, Holger Althues, Lennart Wichmann, Aleksei Sadykov, Sascha Nowak, Peng Yan, Pascal Seete
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Lithium-sulfide positive electrodes represent a promising alternative to established transition metal-based positive electrodes due to enhanced specific capacity and sustainability. While positive electrodes containing elemental sulfur require a lithiated negative electrode, lithium-sulfide can serve as the lithium reservoir and thus be paired with bare copper electrodes in "anode-free" or "zero-excess" cell concepts. This boosts energy density and avoids handling of thin lithium metal electrodes. While promising electrochemical performance of "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries has already been demonstrated, many reported cell configurations rely on nickel- instead of copper-based negative electrodes, undermining the enhanced sustainability bestowed by lithium-sulfide positive electrodes. Demonstrating a continuous reaction between copper electrodes and soluble polysulfide species, two approaches are evaluated that restrict the migration of polysulfide species. While both, in situ polymerization of an electrolyte additive as well as electrospinning of a polymer layer at negative electrodes, enable reversible operation of copper-based "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries, the former approach offers notably enhanced capacity retention. Counterintuitively, the quantification of polysulfide distribution throughout the individual battery components reveals less confinement within the positive electrode as beneficial for the overall reversibility. This demonstrates that a balance between positive and negative electrode reversibility is required to advance "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries.

ChemSusChemVol. 18(23)
University of Münster (DE), Helmholtz-Institute Münster (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Material and Beam Technology (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.