Approaches to Comparing Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness to Guide Potential Preferential Product Recommendations

New influenza vaccine products might be licensed in coming years. Ideally, these vaccines would generate more broadly cross-reactive and longer-lasting protection than those currently licensed. Recommendations for the use of and potential preference for new influenza vaccines should be informed by absolute and comparative effectiveness evaluations. Absolute vaccine effects are commonly evaluated pre- and post-licensure, but more complex comparative evaluations have special considerations discussed in this Viewpoint. Relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) can be assessed in clinical trials, cluster-randomized trials, and a variety of observational designs. Cluster-randomized trials have reduced potential for bias compared to observational studies, but operational barriers may limit feasibility. Observational rVE studies may utilize prospectively collected data or real-world evidence from large healthcare databases. Advantages of observational rVE studies include timeliness and lower cost, but uptake of novel influenza vaccines that is low and variable by age, health status, and other characteristics is a major challenge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf563
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Approaches to Comparing Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness to Guide Potential Preferential Product Recommendations

Brendan Flannery, David L. McClure, Joshua G. Petrie, Sascha Ellington et al.
1 citations
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Influenza Virus Research Studies
1.35
article

Approaches to Comparing Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness to Guide Potential Preferential Product Recommendations

Brendan Flannery, David L. McClure, Joshua G. Petrie, Sascha Ellington, Edward A. Belongia, Nathaniel M. Lewis, Huong Q. Nguyen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

New influenza vaccine products might be licensed in coming years. Ideally, these vaccines would generate more broadly cross-reactive and longer-lasting protection than those currently licensed. Recommendations for the use of and potential preference for new influenza vaccines should be informed by absolute and comparative effectiveness evaluations. Absolute vaccine effects are commonly evaluated pre- and post-licensure, but more complex comparative evaluations have special considerations discussed in this Viewpoint. Relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) can be assessed in clinical trials, cluster-randomized trials, and a variety of observational designs. Cluster-randomized trials have reduced potential for bias compared to observational studies, but operational barriers may limit feasibility. Observational rVE studies may utilize prospectively collected data or real-world evidence from large healthcare databases. Advantages of observational rVE studies include timeliness and lower cost, but uptake of novel influenza vaccines that is low and variable by age, health status, and other characteristics is a major challenge.

Clinical Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Marshfield Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.