The Association between Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physician Density and Pregnancy Outcomes

We sought to examine the association between maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physician density and adverse pregnancy outcomes at the state level.This was a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available, state-level data from 2018 to 2021, including Natality, Multiple Cause-of-Death, and Fetal Death databases. The number of active MFM physicians per year was obtained for each state from the American Medical Association Masterfile. The primary exposure was the density of MFM per state, categorized into three groups: (1) low density (<30 MFM physicians per 100,000 live births), (2) moderate density (30-59 MFM physicians per 100,000 live births), and (3) high density (≥60 MFM physicians per 100,000 live births). Our primary outcome was maternal mortality during pregnancy and up to 42 days postdelivery. Our secondary outcomes were pregnancy-related mortality up to 365 days postdelivery and stillbirth. We calculated adjusted incident rate ratios (aIRR) and average marginal effect (AME) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using multivariable negative binomial mixed effects regression models.Overall, there were 14,792,743 live births, 3,440 maternal mortalities, 4,980 pregnancy-related mortalities, and 90,848 stillbirths included. The median MFM density across states was 31.6 per 100,000 live births (interquartile range: 21.9-42.5). States with high MFM density had a reduced risk of maternal mortality (aIRR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.58-0.85) and pregnancy-related mortality (aIRR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.98) compared with states with low MFM density, corresponding to 7.29 (AME: 95% CI: 3.58-11.00) and 5.57 (AME: 95% CI: 0.74-10.40) less mortality per 100,000 live births, respectively. States with moderate MFM density had a similar risk of maternal mortality compared with low MFM density states (aIRR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.87-1.20).High MFM-density states have a decreased risk of maternal mortality compared with low MFM-density states, suggesting a critical role of MFM in reducing maternal mortality. · An association between MFM physician density and maternal mortality is unclear.. · States with higher MFM density had a lower risk of maternal mortality than those with fewer.. · This study highlights the importance of increasing MFM access in underserved areas to potentially reduce maternal mortality..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2717-3951
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Association between Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physician Density and Pregnancy Outcomes

Tetsuya Kawakita, Lindsay S. Robbins, Rula Atwani, Misa Hayasaka et al.
American Journal of Perinatology
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

The Association between Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physician Density and Pregnancy Outcomes

Tetsuya Kawakita, Lindsay S. Robbins, Rula Atwani, Misa Hayasaka, George R. Saade
article en

Abstract

We sought to examine the association between maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physician density and adverse pregnancy outcomes at the state level.This was a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available, state-level data from 2018 to 2021, including Natality, Multiple Cause-of-Death, and Fetal Death databases. The number of active MFM physicians per year was obtained for each state from the American Medical Association Masterfile. The primary exposure was the density of MFM per state, categorized into three groups: (1) low density (<30 MFM physicians per 100,000 live births), (2) moderate density (30-59 MFM physicians per 100,000 live births), and (3) high density (≥60 MFM physicians per 100,000 live births). Our primary outcome was maternal mortality during pregnancy and up to 42 days postdelivery. Our secondary outcomes were pregnancy-related mortality up to 365 days postdelivery and stillbirth. We calculated adjusted incident rate ratios (aIRR) and average marginal effect (AME) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using multivariable negative binomial mixed effects regression models.Overall, there were 14,792,743 live births, 3,440 maternal mortalities, 4,980 pregnancy-related mortalities, and 90,848 stillbirths included. The median MFM density across states was 31.6 per 100,000 live births (interquartile range: 21.9-42.5). States with high MFM density had a reduced risk of maternal mortality (aIRR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.58-0.85) and pregnancy-related mortality (aIRR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.98) compared with states with low MFM density, corresponding to 7.29 (AME: 95% CI: 3.58-11.00) and 5.57 (AME: 95% CI: 0.74-10.40) less mortality per 100,000 live births, respectively. States with moderate MFM density had a similar risk of maternal mortality compared with low MFM density states (aIRR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.87-1.20).High MFM-density states have a decreased risk of maternal mortality compared with low MFM-density states, suggesting a critical role of MFM in reducing maternal mortality. · An association between MFM physician density and maternal mortality is unclear.. · States with higher MFM density had a lower risk of maternal mortality than those with fewer.. · This study highlights the importance of increasing MFM access in underserved areas to potentially reduce maternal mortality..

American Journal of Perinatology
Eastern Virginia Medical School (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.