“For Russia’s sake, everything is permitted.” The Russian radical right and legitimation of violence, 1900–1940

The radical right in late-imperial Russia arose at the beginning of the 20th century as a reaction to social and economic transformation in society. The far-right professed the conservative state ideology “Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationality”; it was against parliamentarianism, liberalism, and socialism. “Although rooted in conservative thought, the far right was radical in its populism, antisemitism and quest for mass appeal. During the 1905 Revolution, various far-right parties emerged (e.g., the Union of the Russian People). These parties sought to defend the existing order and resorted to violence, which they legitimized as self-defense against revolutionaries. After the revolution of 1917, a significant part of the extreme right went into exile and continued the struggle against the Bolshevik regime. This time, violence was legitimized as righteous revenge against the usurpers of the Russian homeland. In the article, I deal with how the extreme right legitimized political violence. I point to the continuity in the use of violence, which was also related to the continuity of antisemitism. At the same time, however, I draw attention to shifts in the legitimization of violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Violence An International Journal
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26330024251385562
Primary Topic
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“For Russia’s sake, everything is permitted.” The Russian radical right and legitimation of violence, 1900–1940

Zbyněk Vydra
Violence An International Journal
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
article

“For Russia’s sake, everything is permitted.” The Russian radical right and legitimation of violence, 1900–1940

Zbyněk Vydra
article en

Abstract

The radical right in late-imperial Russia arose at the beginning of the 20th century as a reaction to social and economic transformation in society. The far-right professed the conservative state ideology “Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationality”; it was against parliamentarianism, liberalism, and socialism. “Although rooted in conservative thought, the far right was radical in its populism, antisemitism and quest for mass appeal. During the 1905 Revolution, various far-right parties emerged (e.g., the Union of the Russian People). These parties sought to defend the existing order and resorted to violence, which they legitimized as self-defense against revolutionaries. After the revolution of 1917, a significant part of the extreme right went into exile and continued the struggle against the Bolshevik regime. This time, violence was legitimized as righteous revenge against the usurpers of the Russian homeland. In the article, I deal with how the extreme right legitimized political violence. I point to the continuity in the use of violence, which was also related to the continuity of antisemitism. At the same time, however, I draw attention to shifts in the legitimization of violence.

Violence An International JournalVol. 6(2)
University of Pardubice (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Communism, Protests, Social Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“For Russia’s sake, everything is permitted.” The Russian radical right and legitimation of violence, 1900–1940 — Zbyněk Vydra · Violence An International Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS