Challenges and opportunities to tree planting on working landscapes: Insights from New York dairy farmers

Diverse actors are interested in increasing tree cover on working landscapes to address social and ecological challenges. Yet land managers' interest and capacity to engage in tree planting remains unclear. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with dairy farmers across New York State to understand their perspectives on tree planting. Analytically, we draw on political ecology to examine how endogenous factors (e.g., farm succession, land use practices, farmer identity) and exogenous factors (e.g., sectoral consolidation, tenure precarity, policy–market infrastructures) shape the opportunity costs farmers face. Many farmers had already planted and managed trees over the past two decades and viewed expanding tree cover as a strategy for improving resource management. Rather than emphasizing climate change mitigation, they highlighted trees' roles in navigating climatic events (e.g., precipitation, wind, temperature) and enhancing financial resilience. Perceptions of future planting were shaped by regional and sectoral dynamics, including limited access to capital, labor, and land, which often led farmers to deprioritize trees in favor of more pressing investments. These challenges were compounded by technocratic policy legacies and cultural histories of agricultural development, which manifested differently depending on operational type and farmer entry into the sector. We identify key leverage points—such as succession windows, tenure security, and infrastructure for tree value chains—where costs can be rebalanced and land manager participation in tree planting can be made more feasible. This research contributes to a growing body of work suggesting that implementing natural climate solutions on working landscapes requires structural change, place-based analysis, and centering land managers’ lived experience. • Most farmers value trees but face structural constraints. • Farmers in confinement systems seek income; pasture-based focus on adaptation. • Labor, land costs, and tenure issues deter new tree plantings. • Farm constructs and succession affect tree-planting attitudes. • Tree-planting policies must align with farm economic realities and land-use needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103899
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and opportunities to tree planting on working landscapes: Insights from New York dairy farmers

Lily Colburn, Kristen Jovanelly, Luca Guadagno
Journal of Rural Studies
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Challenges and opportunities to tree planting on working landscapes: Insights from New York dairy farmers

Lily Colburn, Kristen Jovanelly, Luca Guadagno
article en

Abstract

Diverse actors are interested in increasing tree cover on working landscapes to address social and ecological challenges. Yet land managers' interest and capacity to engage in tree planting remains unclear. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with dairy farmers across New York State to understand their perspectives on tree planting. Analytically, we draw on political ecology to examine how endogenous factors (e.g., farm succession, land use practices, farmer identity) and exogenous factors (e.g., sectoral consolidation, tenure precarity, policy–market infrastructures) shape the opportunity costs farmers face. Many farmers had already planted and managed trees over the past two decades and viewed expanding tree cover as a strategy for improving resource management. Rather than emphasizing climate change mitigation, they highlighted trees' roles in navigating climatic events (e.g., precipitation, wind, temperature) and enhancing financial resilience. Perceptions of future planting were shaped by regional and sectoral dynamics, including limited access to capital, labor, and land, which often led farmers to deprioritize trees in favor of more pressing investments. These challenges were compounded by technocratic policy legacies and cultural histories of agricultural development, which manifested differently depending on operational type and farmer entry into the sector. We identify key leverage points—such as succession windows, tenure security, and infrastructure for tree value chains—where costs can be rebalanced and land manager participation in tree planting can be made more feasible. This research contributes to a growing body of work suggesting that implementing natural climate solutions on working landscapes requires structural change, place-based analysis, and centering land managers’ lived experience. • Most farmers value trees but face structural constraints. • Farmers in confinement systems seek income; pasture-based focus on adaptation. • Labor, land costs, and tenure issues deter new tree plantings. • Farm constructs and succession affect tree-planting attitudes. • Tree-planting policies must align with farm economic realities and land-use needs.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 121
Dartmouth College (US), Wildlife Conservation Society (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.