Electron Energization by Dispersive Alfvén Waves in the Cusp

Abstract The propagation of kinetic Alfvén waves (assumed sourced from intermittent dayside reconnection) is investigated with a gyrofluid‐kinetic electron model compared with Cluster observations. These observations reveal electron distributions that are preferentially field‐aligned or field‐opposed, with signatures that are unidirectional or counterstreaming and skews that vary with the current sense. The simulations reproduce, with good fidelity, the observed local characteristics when the conditions match the observed local plasma conditions. The wave energy conversion is predominantly positive at mid‐altitudes, indicating a transfer of wave to electron energy. This conversion rate increases significantly at low‐altitudes (in the inertial Alfvén wave regime) and is accompanied by the formation of highly field‐aligned electron beams peaking at several hundred eV in energy, with a directionality that is opposite to the current sense. This low‐altitude energization results in the dissipation of the majority of the wave Poynting flux and would lead to substantial soft electron precipitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl116922
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electron Energization by Dispersive Alfvén Waves in the Cusp

A. J. Hull, P. A. Damiano, Y. Lin, C. C. Chaston et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Electron Energization by Dispersive Alfvén Waves in the Cusp

A. J. Hull, P. A. Damiano, Y. Lin, C. C. Chaston, J. R. Johnson
article en

Abstract

Abstract The propagation of kinetic Alfvén waves (assumed sourced from intermittent dayside reconnection) is investigated with a gyrofluid‐kinetic electron model compared with Cluster observations. These observations reveal electron distributions that are preferentially field‐aligned or field‐opposed, with signatures that are unidirectional or counterstreaming and skews that vary with the current sense. The simulations reproduce, with good fidelity, the observed local characteristics when the conditions match the observed local plasma conditions. The wave energy conversion is predominantly positive at mid‐altitudes, indicating a transfer of wave to electron energy. This conversion rate increases significantly at low‐altitudes (in the inertial Alfvén wave regime) and is accompanied by the formation of highly field‐aligned electron beams peaking at several hundred eV in energy, with a directionality that is opposite to the current sense. This low‐altitude energization results in the dissipation of the majority of the wave Poynting flux and would lead to substantial soft electron precipitation.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(19)
Andrews University (US), University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), Auburn University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.