Preparing Teachers for Inclusion: A Path Model Examining How Readiness Influences Responses

This study examined how teacher readiness dimensions influence pre-service teachers' emotional responses to inclusive education.A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 255 pre-service teachers at a teacher education university in Taipei.Participants completed the "Readiness and Responses to Inclusive Education Questionnaire" after reading a scenario about teaching students with special needs.Latent variable path analysis examined relationships between three readiness dimensions (Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudinal Readiness) and two response outcomes (Positive Acceptance and Negative Anxiety).Both path models demonstrated excellent fit (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06).Skills Readiness emerged as the strongest predictor of both Positive Acceptance ( = 0.45, p < .001)and reduced Negative Anxiety ( = -0.61,p < .001).Attitudinal Readiness also significantly predicted both outcomes ( = 0.32 and = -0.15,respectively).Knowledge Readiness did not directly predict responses but showed strong correlation with Skills Readiness (r = 0.79).Results indicate that practical competencies are more critical than theoretical knowledge in shaping emotional responses to inclusive education.Teacher preparation programs should prioritize skills-based training and experiential learning while addressing attitudes and anxieties about inclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2025.0258
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparing Teachers for Inclusion: A Path Model Examining How Readiness Influences Responses

Yung-Ho Huang
International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education
Education Systems and Policy
article

Preparing Teachers for Inclusion: A Path Model Examining How Readiness Influences Responses

Yung-Ho Huang
article en

Abstract

This study examined how teacher readiness dimensions influence pre-service teachers' emotional responses to inclusive education.A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 255 pre-service teachers at a teacher education university in Taipei.Participants completed the "Readiness and Responses to Inclusive Education Questionnaire" after reading a scenario about teaching students with special needs.Latent variable path analysis examined relationships between three readiness dimensions (Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudinal Readiness) and two response outcomes (Positive Acceptance and Negative Anxiety).Both path models demonstrated excellent fit (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06).Skills Readiness emerged as the strongest predictor of both Positive Acceptance ( = 0.45, p < .001)and reduced Negative Anxiety ( = -0.61,p < .001).Attitudinal Readiness also significantly predicted both outcomes ( = 0.32 and = -0.15,respectively).Knowledge Readiness did not directly predict responses but showed strong correlation with Skills Readiness (r = 0.79).Results indicate that practical competencies are more critical than theoretical knowledge in shaping emotional responses to inclusive education.Teacher preparation programs should prioritize skills-based training and experiential learning while addressing attitudes and anxieties about inclusion.

International Journal of Technology and Inclusive EducationVol. 14(1)
National Taipei University of Education (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Education Systems and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.