Pre‐service teachers' explicit and implicit stereotypes towards pupils with different special educational needs

The study found that pre-service teachers clearly endorsed explicit stereotypes and showed implicit associations in line with these stereotypes, especially towards autistic pupils and those with Down syndrome, while patterns for dyslexia were less pronounced. These results underline how common such stereotypes are in educational contexts and suggest that interventions should address both explicit and implicit bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.70041
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre‐service teachers' explicit and implicit stereotypes towards pupils with different special educational needs

Hannah Kleen, Charlotte Dignath, Mareike Kunter, Nathalie John et al.
1 citations
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
article

Pre‐service teachers' explicit and implicit stereotypes towards pupils with different special educational needs

Hannah Kleen, Charlotte Dignath, Mareike Kunter, Nathalie John, Charlotte S. Schell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The study found that pre-service teachers clearly endorsed explicit stereotypes and showed implicit associations in line with these stereotypes, especially towards autistic pupils and those with Down syndrome, while patterns for dyslexia were less pronounced. These results underline how common such stereotypes are in educational contexts and suggest that interventions should address both explicit and implicit bias.

British Journal of Educational Psychology
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Individual Development and Adaptive Education (DE), DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.