Global patterns in forest carbon storage estimation: bibliometric analysis of technological evolution, accuracy gains and scaling challenges

Introduction Estimation of forest carbon (C) storage is essential for understanding the global C cycle, mitigating climate change, and developing carbon markets. However, systematic research on forest C storage estimation needs improving. Methods Herein, a bibliometric and content review of literature published between 2008 and 2025 was conducted to synthesize temporal and spatial trends and to identify methodological advances and gaps in forest C-storage estimation. Results The results revealed that environmental sciences accounted for the largest share of publications ( n = 718). The most productive institution and country were the Chinese Academy of Sciences ( n = 208) and the United States ( n = 691), respectively. Research progress in the field was categorized into three distinct stages since 2008. The early stage (2008–2012) was dominated by eddy covariance, satellite remote sensing, and airborne radar. The middle stage (2013–2017) was characterized by greater use of process-based and statistical simulation models. In the later stage (2018–2025), techniques such as random forest (RF), machine learning and biomass mapping became more widely used. Over this period, model performance improved substantially, especially the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) increased from 0.62 to 0.97 for the TRIPLEX-Flux C-exchange model and from 0.63 to 0.97 for RF models. Discussion Spatially, most studies addressed local-to-regional scales, whereas large-scale or global assessments remain limited. This synthesis clarifies methodological trajectories and persistent gaps that can guide the development and wider deployment of forest C-storage estimation approaches and support evidence-based climate policy and C-market design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1649356
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global patterns in forest carbon storage estimation: bibliometric analysis of technological evolution, accuracy gains and scaling challenges

Zhi‐Qiang Liu, Hongwei Zhou, Jiaxuan Liu, Peng Cui et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Forest ecology and management
2.31
article

Global patterns in forest carbon storage estimation: bibliometric analysis of technological evolution, accuracy gains and scaling challenges

Zhi‐Qiang Liu, Hongwei Zhou, Jiaxuan Liu, Peng Cui, Danyan Chen, Yuanyuan Feng, Haibo Hu, Bing Ma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Estimation of forest carbon (C) storage is essential for understanding the global C cycle, mitigating climate change, and developing carbon markets. However, systematic research on forest C storage estimation needs improving. Methods Herein, a bibliometric and content review of literature published between 2008 and 2025 was conducted to synthesize temporal and spatial trends and to identify methodological advances and gaps in forest C-storage estimation. Results The results revealed that environmental sciences accounted for the largest share of publications ( n = 718). The most productive institution and country were the Chinese Academy of Sciences ( n = 208) and the United States ( n = 691), respectively. Research progress in the field was categorized into three distinct stages since 2008. The early stage (2008–2012) was dominated by eddy covariance, satellite remote sensing, and airborne radar. The middle stage (2013–2017) was characterized by greater use of process-based and statistical simulation models. In the later stage (2018–2025), techniques such as random forest (RF), machine learning and biomass mapping became more widely used. Over this period, model performance improved substantially, especially the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) increased from 0.62 to 0.97 for the TRIPLEX-Flux C-exchange model and from 0.63 to 0.97 for RF models. Discussion Spatially, most studies addressed local-to-regional scales, whereas large-scale or global assessments remain limited. This synthesis clarifies methodological trajectories and persistent gaps that can guide the development and wider deployment of forest C-storage estimation approaches and support evidence-based climate policy and C-market design.

Frontiers in Forests and Global ChangeVol. 8
Nanjing Forestry University (CN), Changzhou Institute of Technology (CN), Jiangsu Provincial Institute of Geological Survey (CN), Jiangsu University of Technology (CN), Jinling Institute of Technology (CN), Umeå University (SE)
Government of Jiangsu Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Forest ecology and management
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.