Teaching Paper: Data Collection Tools – Building Reliable Foundations for Non-Profit Impact Assessment

Effective impact assessment depends on the collection of accurate, reliable, and contextually appropriate data. This Teaching Paper introduces a range of qualitative and quantitative data collection tools, emphasizing their role in strengthening evaluation processes in non-profit organizations. Qualitative tools such as interview guides, focus group frameworks, and observation checklists allow for nuanced understanding of participant experiences, while quantitative instruments such as surveys, data entry software, and mobile data collection applications generate measurable evidence. Drawing on established evaluation literature, the paper provides practical notes for applying these tools in diverse organizational contexts, including low-resource environments. A case study illustrates how combining qualitative and quantitative approaches can enhance program evaluation. Reflection questions, common challenges, and academic framing ensure that this resource is relevant both for practitioners and for scholars of monitoring and evaluation.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-impcassmsrcmm-tp-03
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Paper: Data Collection Tools – Building Reliable Foundations for Non-Profit Impact Assessment

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Teaching Paper: Data Collection Tools – Building Reliable Foundations for Non-Profit Impact Assessment

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Effective impact assessment depends on the collection of accurate, reliable, and contextually appropriate data. This Teaching Paper introduces a range of qualitative and quantitative data collection tools, emphasizing their role in strengthening evaluation processes in non-profit organizations. Qualitative tools such as interview guides, focus group frameworks, and observation checklists allow for nuanced understanding of participant experiences, while quantitative instruments such as surveys, data entry software, and mobile data collection applications generate measurable evidence. Drawing on established evaluation literature, the paper provides practical notes for applying these tools in diverse organizational contexts, including low-resource environments. A case study illustrates how combining qualitative and quantitative approaches can enhance program evaluation. Reflection questions, common challenges, and academic framing ensure that this resource is relevant both for practitioners and for scholars of monitoring and evaluation.

Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Teaching Paper: Data Collection Tools – Building Reliable Foundations for Non-Profit Impact Assessment — Anna Neya Kazanskaia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS