Teaching Paper: Restrictive Laws and Civil Society – Understanding Global Trends in NGO Regulation

Civil society organizations (CSOs) play a crucial role in advancing democratic governance, protecting human rights, and providing essential services. However, since the late 2000s, restrictive laws have proliferated globally, limiting NGOs’ access to funding, imposing administrative burdens, and stigmatizing advocacy. This Teaching Paper analyzes legal trends across eight countries—Russia, Ethiopia, China, India, Hungary, Egypt, Belarus, and Cambodia—demonstrating how authoritarian diffusion shapes these policies. By linking theory and practice, it equips scholars and practitioners with tools to understand the intent, mechanisms, and implications of such restrictions, while also suggesting adaptive strategies for NGOs facing shrinking civic space. The paper situates legal repression within broader global governance debates, emphasizing the importance of resilience, local agency, and international solidarity in sustaining civil society under pressure.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-cvscunprrsenv-tp-01
Primary Topic
Global and Cross-Cultural Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Paper: Restrictive Laws and Civil Society – Understanding Global Trends in NGO Regulation

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Global and Cross-Cultural Management
article

Teaching Paper: Restrictive Laws and Civil Society – Understanding Global Trends in NGO Regulation

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Civil society organizations (CSOs) play a crucial role in advancing democratic governance, protecting human rights, and providing essential services. However, since the late 2000s, restrictive laws have proliferated globally, limiting NGOs’ access to funding, imposing administrative burdens, and stigmatizing advocacy. This Teaching Paper analyzes legal trends across eight countries—Russia, Ethiopia, China, India, Hungary, Egypt, Belarus, and Cambodia—demonstrating how authoritarian diffusion shapes these policies. By linking theory and practice, it equips scholars and practitioners with tools to understand the intent, mechanisms, and implications of such restrictions, while also suggesting adaptive strategies for NGOs facing shrinking civic space. The paper situates legal repression within broader global governance debates, emphasizing the importance of resilience, local agency, and international solidarity in sustaining civil society under pressure.

Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Global and Cross-Cultural Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.