Critiques of Contemporary Philanthropy: Legitimacy, Accountability, and Justice

Contemporary philanthropy stands at the intersection of generosity and power. While often celebrated for its contributions to innovation and development, it is equally subject to critical scrutiny concerning legitimacy, accountability, and justice. This article synthesizes key critiques of modern philanthropy, examining how elite capture, weak oversight, and the rise of philanthrocapitalism reinforce systemic inequities. Feminist and decolonial perspectives reveal how gendered and neo-colonial dynamics persist within philanthropic institutions, marginalizing local knowledge and grassroots agency. Distinguishing between normative critiques of legitimacy and practical critiques of effectiveness, the analysis positions philanthropy as a political rather than neutral act. It calls for participatory, feminist, and decolonial approaches that prioritize transparency, inclusion, and systemic transformation. Only through accountability and shared governance can philanthropy evolve into a credible force for global justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-philintrantrninnov-07
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critiques of Contemporary Philanthropy: Legitimacy, Accountability, and Justice

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Religion, Society, and Development
article

Critiques of Contemporary Philanthropy: Legitimacy, Accountability, and Justice

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Contemporary philanthropy stands at the intersection of generosity and power. While often celebrated for its contributions to innovation and development, it is equally subject to critical scrutiny concerning legitimacy, accountability, and justice. This article synthesizes key critiques of modern philanthropy, examining how elite capture, weak oversight, and the rise of philanthrocapitalism reinforce systemic inequities. Feminist and decolonial perspectives reveal how gendered and neo-colonial dynamics persist within philanthropic institutions, marginalizing local knowledge and grassroots agency. Distinguishing between normative critiques of legitimacy and practical critiques of effectiveness, the analysis positions philanthropy as a political rather than neutral act. It calls for participatory, feminist, and decolonial approaches that prioritize transparency, inclusion, and systemic transformation. Only through accountability and shared governance can philanthropy evolve into a credible force for global justice.

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critiques of Contemporary Philanthropy: Legitimacy, Accountability, and Justice — Anna Neya Kazanskaia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS