Hybrid Governance and Public Value in South African PPPs: Balancing Trust, Accountability and Participation

Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs) are increasingly promoted as vehicles for addressing complex service delivery challenges, yet their ability to generate sustainable public value remains contested. This study examines how hybrid governance arrangements in South African PPPs shape public value creation, using Public Value Theory (PVT) and integrating it with a hybrid governance perspective. Using a qualitative research design and secondary data analysis, the study applies a thematic approach guided by the Public Value-Hybrid Governance Interaction Model. The findings reveal that public value creation depends less on the formal adoption of hybrid governance structures than on the quality of their operationalisation across four interlinked dimensions: structural (role clarity and institutional alignment), processual (genuine co-production and stakeholder participation), relational (balance between trust and accountability), and outcome (equitable, legitimate, and sustainable results). This ‘less’ refers to a weaker correlation between the mere existence of hybrid structures and public value, compared to the stronger influence of their operational quality, particularly the extent to which they foster inclusive participation, clear accountability, and trust-building practices. Across these dimensions, persistent legitimacy deficits, institutional ambiguity, compliance-heavy oversight, and tokenistic participation weaken feedback loops essential for sustaining public value. Theoretically, the study extends PVT by positioning the trust-accountability equilibrium as a central determinant of value creation in hybrid contexts, rather than a peripheral moderator. Practically, it recommends governance designs that align institutional logics, embed inclusive participation, calibrate accountability mechanisms, and adopt multidimensional performance measures. By operationalising these principles, PPPs in South Africa can move beyond transactional efficiency towards transformative, equity-driven outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v2i3.264
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in South Africa
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Governance and Public Value in South African PPPs: Balancing Trust, Accountability and Participation

Mahlatse Ragolane
The International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities
Legal Issues in South Africa
article

Hybrid Governance and Public Value in South African PPPs: Balancing Trust, Accountability and Participation

Mahlatse Ragolane
article en

Abstract

Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs) are increasingly promoted as vehicles for addressing complex service delivery challenges, yet their ability to generate sustainable public value remains contested. This study examines how hybrid governance arrangements in South African PPPs shape public value creation, using Public Value Theory (PVT) and integrating it with a hybrid governance perspective. Using a qualitative research design and secondary data analysis, the study applies a thematic approach guided by the Public Value-Hybrid Governance Interaction Model. The findings reveal that public value creation depends less on the formal adoption of hybrid governance structures than on the quality of their operationalisation across four interlinked dimensions: structural (role clarity and institutional alignment), processual (genuine co-production and stakeholder participation), relational (balance between trust and accountability), and outcome (equitable, legitimate, and sustainable results). This ‘less’ refers to a weaker correlation between the mere existence of hybrid structures and public value, compared to the stronger influence of their operational quality, particularly the extent to which they foster inclusive participation, clear accountability, and trust-building practices. Across these dimensions, persistent legitimacy deficits, institutional ambiguity, compliance-heavy oversight, and tokenistic participation weaken feedback loops essential for sustaining public value. Theoretically, the study extends PVT by positioning the trust-accountability equilibrium as a central determinant of value creation in hybrid contexts, rather than a peripheral moderator. Practically, it recommends governance designs that align institutional logics, embed inclusive participation, calibrate accountability mechanisms, and adopt multidimensional performance measures. By operationalising these principles, PPPs in South Africa can move beyond transactional efficiency towards transformative, equity-driven outcomes.

The International Journal of Law, Social Science, and HumanitiesVol. 2(3)
Regent Business School (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Legal Issues in South Africa
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.