Comparative seismic fragility assessment of tunnel infrastructure embedded in soil versus rock

This study presents a comprehensive framework for developing and assessing seismic fragility models for metro tunnels in one network, addressing seismic damage to both structural and non-structural components. Detailed nonlinear dynamic analyses were conducted on two representative tunnel types - D-shape tunnels embedded in rock at varying depths, and rectangular cut-and-cover tunnels in soil with different layering profiles - using seven tunnel-soil/rock configurations and 40 site-consistent ground motions. The study integrates a rigorous treatment of axial-bending interactions for tunnel responses, capturing full-time histories of the moment demand-to-capacity ratio as the structural damage index, and assesses non-structural damage using deck accelerations. Probabilistic seismic demand models were developed through linear and bilinear regressions, with peak ground acceleration (PGA) identified as the optimal intensity measure. Results show that D-shape tunnels in rock exhibit negligible probability of damage under PGAs typical of the sites, while cut-and-cover tunnels display steep fragility curves, indicating a certain level of vulnerability at low seismic intensities. Non-structural components in both tunnel types are shown to be susceptible to damage, underscoring the need for operational safety measures, such as automatic train stoppage under high deck accelerations. The proposed fragility framework provides critical insights to be applied to integrated urban tunnel networks for identifying and prioritizing weak links that facilitate post-earthquake emergency response, retrofitting decisions, and resilience-based seismic design. • Developed high-fidelity numerical models validated against centrifuge tests. • Integrated axial-bending interaction into the structural damage index computation. • Developed bilinear PSDM of D-shape tunnels in rock due to damage mode shifts. • Offered a transferable framework for portfolio-level seismic risk assessment in tunnel networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109849
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative seismic fragility assessment of tunnel infrastructure embedded in soil versus rock

Grigorios Tsinidis, Farzaneh Abedini, Yazhou Xie
1 citations
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
0.95
article

Comparative seismic fragility assessment of tunnel infrastructure embedded in soil versus rock

Grigorios Tsinidis, Farzaneh Abedini, Yazhou Xie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive framework for developing and assessing seismic fragility models for metro tunnels in one network, addressing seismic damage to both structural and non-structural components. Detailed nonlinear dynamic analyses were conducted on two representative tunnel types - D-shape tunnels embedded in rock at varying depths, and rectangular cut-and-cover tunnels in soil with different layering profiles - using seven tunnel-soil/rock configurations and 40 site-consistent ground motions. The study integrates a rigorous treatment of axial-bending interactions for tunnel responses, capturing full-time histories of the moment demand-to-capacity ratio as the structural damage index, and assesses non-structural damage using deck accelerations. Probabilistic seismic demand models were developed through linear and bilinear regressions, with peak ground acceleration (PGA) identified as the optimal intensity measure. Results show that D-shape tunnels in rock exhibit negligible probability of damage under PGAs typical of the sites, while cut-and-cover tunnels display steep fragility curves, indicating a certain level of vulnerability at low seismic intensities. Non-structural components in both tunnel types are shown to be susceptible to damage, underscoring the need for operational safety measures, such as automatic train stoppage under high deck accelerations. The proposed fragility framework provides critical insights to be applied to integrated urban tunnel networks for identifying and prioritizing weak links that facilitate post-earthquake emergency response, retrofitting decisions, and resilience-based seismic design. • Developed high-fidelity numerical models validated against centrifuge tests. • Integrated axial-bending interaction into the structural damage index computation. • Developed bilinear PSDM of D-shape tunnels in rock due to damage mode shifts. • Offered a transferable framework for portfolio-level seismic risk assessment in tunnel networks.

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringVol. 200
University of Thessaly (GR), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.