In-Hospital Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection Repair in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Population Study of National Inpatient Sample From 2015 to 2020

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a recognized risk factor for aortic dissection development due to its association with arterial hypertension, negative intrathoracic pressures during respiratory efforts, and further development of aortic false lumen. However, the impact of OSA on the outcomes of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a population-based analysis of the impact of OSA on in-hospital outcomes following TAAD repair.MethodsPatients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from the last quarter of 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were employed to compare the in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without OSA, where demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer-in status were adjusted for.ResultsThere were 465 (10.86%) and 3817 (89.14%) patients with and without OSA who underwent TAAD repair. Patients with and without OSA had comparable in-hospital mortality (9.89% vs 15.75%, aOR = 0.744, 95 CI = 0.535-1.035, <i>P</i> = .08). Patients with OSA had a higher risk of diaphragmatic paralysis (0.86% vs 0.21%, aOR = 4.821, 95 CI = 1.405-16.539, <i>P</i> = .01) but lower risks of pericardial complications (12.04% vs 19.02%, aOR = 0.675, 95 CI = 0.501-0.909, <i>P</i> = .01) and cardiogenic shock (11.40% vs 18.21%, aOR = 0.643, 95 CI = 0.472-0.875, <i>P</i> = .01). All other in-hospital outcomes were comparable.ConclusionWhile OSA is a known risk factor for the development of TAAD, it does not appear to significantly affect short-term surgical outcomes. Future research should focus on stratifying OSA by duration and severity and examining the long-term prognosis of these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251387757
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-Hospital Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection Repair in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Population Study of National Inpatient Sample From 2015 to 2020

Stephen J. Huddleston, Renxi Li, Deyanira J. Prastein
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

In-Hospital Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection Repair in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Population Study of National Inpatient Sample From 2015 to 2020

Stephen J. Huddleston, Renxi Li, Deyanira J. Prastein
article en

Abstract

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a recognized risk factor for aortic dissection development due to its association with arterial hypertension, negative intrathoracic pressures during respiratory efforts, and further development of aortic false lumen. However, the impact of OSA on the outcomes of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a population-based analysis of the impact of OSA on in-hospital outcomes following TAAD repair.MethodsPatients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from the last quarter of 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were employed to compare the in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without OSA, where demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer-in status were adjusted for.ResultsThere were 465 (10.86%) and 3817 (89.14%) patients with and without OSA who underwent TAAD repair. Patients with and without OSA had comparable in-hospital mortality (9.89% vs 15.75%, aOR = 0.744, 95 CI = 0.535-1.035, <i>P</i> = .08). Patients with OSA had a higher risk of diaphragmatic paralysis (0.86% vs 0.21%, aOR = 4.821, 95 CI = 1.405-16.539, <i>P</i> = .01) but lower risks of pericardial complications (12.04% vs 19.02%, aOR = 0.675, 95 CI = 0.501-0.909, <i>P</i> = .01) and cardiogenic shock (11.40% vs 18.21%, aOR = 0.643, 95 CI = 0.472-0.875, <i>P</i> = .01). All other in-hospital outcomes were comparable.ConclusionWhile OSA is a known risk factor for the development of TAAD, it does not appear to significantly affect short-term surgical outcomes. Future research should focus on stratifying OSA by duration and severity and examining the long-term prognosis of these patients.

Vascular and Endovascular SurgeryVol. 60(2)
George Washington University Hospital (US), George Washington University (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.