Post-Spinal Anaesthesia Low Back Pain Prevalence and Predictors; A Multi-Centers Study from Middle East

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common but under-recognized complication following spinal anaesthesia. Aim of Study:We sought to determine the prevalence of new or worsened LBP among patients who underwent various surgeries under spinal anaesthesia and identify independent procedural and patient-related predictors. Methods:We performed a retrospective cohort study of 165 patients who had various surgeries under spinal anaesthesia from different hospitals in Middle East region.Patient demographics, anaesthetic details (needle gauge, approach, puncture position, number of attempts), surgical data (procedure type, duration, patient positioning) and history of pre-existing LBP were extracted from medical records.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis (IBM SPSS v20) showed odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), with p < 0.05 considered significant.Results: Of 165 patients, 89 (54%) developed new or worsened LBP.On univariate analysis, large-bore needles (18-22 G) (OR 15.3; 95% CI 7.1-32.8;p < 0.001), median (midline) approach (OR 9.1; 95% CI 4.3-19.0;p < 0.001), 2 puncture attempts (OR 20.6; 95% CI 9.2-46.1;p < 0.001), lateral surgical positioning (OR 13.6; 95% CI 6.4-28.9;p < 0.001) and operative duration > 60 minutes (OR 12.3; 95% CI 5.8-26.0;p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with LBP.In multivariate modelling, only 2 puncture attempts (adjusted OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.1-15.2;p = 0.038) and longer surgery (> 60 minutes) (adjusted OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.3-12.8;p = 0.014) remained independent predictors.Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit was satisfactory (^2 = 5.58, p = 0.47). Conclusion:More than half of patients experienced low back pain after spinal anaesthesia.Repeated dural puncture attempts and prolonged operative time independently increased risk.Strategies to achieve first-pass success-such as ultrasound guidance, optimized patient positioning, and experienced operators-and to minimize surgical duration may mitigate postoperative LBP.

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Scientific Neurology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31080/asne.2025.08.0868
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-Spinal Anaesthesia Low Back Pain Prevalence and Predictors; A Multi-Centers Study from Middle East

Acta Scientific Neurology
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Post-Spinal Anaesthesia Low Back Pain Prevalence and Predictors; A Multi-Centers Study from Middle East

article en

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common but under-recognized complication following spinal anaesthesia. Aim of Study:We sought to determine the prevalence of new or worsened LBP among patients who underwent various surgeries under spinal anaesthesia and identify independent procedural and patient-related predictors. Methods:We performed a retrospective cohort study of 165 patients who had various surgeries under spinal anaesthesia from different hospitals in Middle East region.Patient demographics, anaesthetic details (needle gauge, approach, puncture position, number of attempts), surgical data (procedure type, duration, patient positioning) and history of pre-existing LBP were extracted from medical records.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis (IBM SPSS v20) showed odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), with p < 0.05 considered significant.Results: Of 165 patients, 89 (54%) developed new or worsened LBP.On univariate analysis, large-bore needles (18-22 G) (OR 15.3; 95% CI 7.1-32.8;p < 0.001), median (midline) approach (OR 9.1; 95% CI 4.3-19.0;p < 0.001), 2 puncture attempts (OR 20.6; 95% CI 9.2-46.1;p < 0.001), lateral surgical positioning (OR 13.6; 95% CI 6.4-28.9;p < 0.001) and operative duration > 60 minutes (OR 12.3; 95% CI 5.8-26.0;p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with LBP.In multivariate modelling, only 2 puncture attempts (adjusted OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.1-15.2;p = 0.038) and longer surgery (> 60 minutes) (adjusted OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.3-12.8;p = 0.014) remained independent predictors.Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit was satisfactory (^2 = 5.58, p = 0.47). Conclusion:More than half of patients experienced low back pain after spinal anaesthesia.Repeated dural puncture attempts and prolonged operative time independently increased risk.Strategies to achieve first-pass success-such as ultrasound guidance, optimized patient positioning, and experienced operators-and to minimize surgical duration may mitigate postoperative LBP.

Acta Scientific Neurology
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Post-Spinal Anaesthesia Low Back Pain Prevalence and Predictors; A Multi-Centers Study from Middle East · Acta Scientific Neurology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS