Polystyrene and polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastics differentially impact mouse ovarian follicle function

Exposure to micro- and nanoplastics is unavoidable. Foods and beverages contain plastic particles from environmental contamination and processing and packaging materials, which are frequently made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Micro- and nanoplastics have been detected in human tissues such as the brain, liver, and placenta, as well as in ovarian follicular fluid, but little is known about the effects nanoplastics have on the female reproductive system. In addition, few studies on the health impacts of nanoplastics have been performed using environmentally relevant plastic types and concentrations. Thus, this research tested the hypothesis that nanoplastics made of spherical polystyrene (PS), a common model nanoplastic, would have different effects on cultured mouse ovarian follicles compared to secondary PET nanoplastics at environmentally relevant doses. The ovary is a highly sensitive reproductive organ responsible for the development of follicles, which contain the oocyte, and production of steroid hormones. Follicles were harvested from adult mouse ovaries and cultured for 96 h with vehicle, spherical commercially available 220 nm PS nanoplastics (1-100 μg/mL), or lab-generated 240 nm PET nanoplastics (0.1-10 μg/mL). PS and PET nanoplastic exposure inhibited follicle growth and altered expression of genes related to steroid synthesis, cell cycle, and oxidative stress. PET nanoplastics increased levels of pregnenolone and decreased expression of Cyp17a1. Overall, both plastic types altered ovarian function, but they impacted different genes in similar pathways. These findings suggest that nanoplastic exposure at environmentally relevant concentrations may pose a risk to female reproductive health by disrupting hormonal and molecular pathways. In addition, environmentally relevant plastic types and doses are necessary for studying health impacts of nanoplastics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Pollution
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127228
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polystyrene and polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastics differentially impact mouse ovarian follicle function

Indrani Gupta, Somenath Mitra, Mohammad Saiful Islam, Rebecca M. Reynolds et al.
1 citations
Environmental Pollution
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.50
article

Polystyrene and polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastics differentially impact mouse ovarian follicle function

Indrani Gupta, Somenath Mitra, Mohammad Saiful Islam, Rebecca M. Reynolds, Genoa R. Warner, Hanin Alahmadi, Allison Harbolic, Maira Nadeem, Chris N. Potts, Alixs M. Pujols, Gania Lafontant
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Exposure to micro- and nanoplastics is unavoidable. Foods and beverages contain plastic particles from environmental contamination and processing and packaging materials, which are frequently made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Micro- and nanoplastics have been detected in human tissues such as the brain, liver, and placenta, as well as in ovarian follicular fluid, but little is known about the effects nanoplastics have on the female reproductive system. In addition, few studies on the health impacts of nanoplastics have been performed using environmentally relevant plastic types and concentrations. Thus, this research tested the hypothesis that nanoplastics made of spherical polystyrene (PS), a common model nanoplastic, would have different effects on cultured mouse ovarian follicles compared to secondary PET nanoplastics at environmentally relevant doses. The ovary is a highly sensitive reproductive organ responsible for the development of follicles, which contain the oocyte, and production of steroid hormones. Follicles were harvested from adult mouse ovaries and cultured for 96 h with vehicle, spherical commercially available 220 nm PS nanoplastics (1-100 μg/mL), or lab-generated 240 nm PET nanoplastics (0.1-10 μg/mL). PS and PET nanoplastic exposure inhibited follicle growth and altered expression of genes related to steroid synthesis, cell cycle, and oxidative stress. PET nanoplastics increased levels of pregnenolone and decreased expression of Cyp17a1. Overall, both plastic types altered ovarian function, but they impacted different genes in similar pathways. These findings suggest that nanoplastic exposure at environmentally relevant concentrations may pose a risk to female reproductive health by disrupting hormonal and molecular pathways. In addition, environmentally relevant plastic types and doses are necessary for studying health impacts of nanoplastics.

Environmental PollutionVol. 386
New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.