Integrating ethnographic futures research with critical realism and grounded theory

This paper presents Critical Realist Grounded Ethnographic Futures Research (CRG-EFR) as a development of the Ethnographic Futures Research (EFR) method. EFR is a long-established but under documented and developed scenario building method, that directly engages with images of the future held by a defined social group. Responding to the challenge that scenario methods lack theoretical depth compared to established social research methods, CRG-EFR is systematically built to combine the qualities of both, to enhance the scenario building process. Critical realism is established as a basis for understanding present reality and future possibilities, in which predictions are possible as conjectural knowledge of the future and can be systematically developed. EFR is set out as a method for building scenarios from conjectural knowledge of the future. Grounded Theory (GT) is then introduced as a rigorous research methodology that closely resembles the overall procedure of EFR, providing an established basis for the analysis of qualitative data that maintains the emic perspective of the futures of those social groups being researched. The application of the CRG-EFR method is illustrated in a discussion of its use in an ongoing research project, demonstrating how it achieves the methodological rigour necessary to meet quality criteria for grounded theory. The paper concludes by considering the limitations of the CRG-EFR method compared to classical EFR, identifying CRG-EFR as ideal suited for transformative futures research in which culturally embedded insights are foundational to images of the future . • Presents Critical Realist Grounded - Ethnographic Futures Research (CRG-EFR) as a development of Ethnographic Futures Research. • Provides new insights on critical realism as an ontology and epistemology of future studies and its role in prediction. • Demonstrates how grounded theory can be applied in futures research by integrating it with EFR to build scenarios. • Demonstrates how CRG-EFR enhances the theoretical depth and methodological rigour of Ethnographic Futures Research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Futures
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103711
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating ethnographic futures research with critical realism and grounded theory

Avşar Gürpınar, Mark Evans, M.A. Sinclair, Lee Adams
Futures
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Integrating ethnographic futures research with critical realism and grounded theory

Avşar Gürpınar, Mark Evans, M.A. Sinclair, Lee Adams
article en

Abstract

This paper presents Critical Realist Grounded Ethnographic Futures Research (CRG-EFR) as a development of the Ethnographic Futures Research (EFR) method. EFR is a long-established but under documented and developed scenario building method, that directly engages with images of the future held by a defined social group. Responding to the challenge that scenario methods lack theoretical depth compared to established social research methods, CRG-EFR is systematically built to combine the qualities of both, to enhance the scenario building process. Critical realism is established as a basis for understanding present reality and future possibilities, in which predictions are possible as conjectural knowledge of the future and can be systematically developed. EFR is set out as a method for building scenarios from conjectural knowledge of the future. Grounded Theory (GT) is then introduced as a rigorous research methodology that closely resembles the overall procedure of EFR, providing an established basis for the analysis of qualitative data that maintains the emic perspective of the futures of those social groups being researched. The application of the CRG-EFR method is illustrated in a discussion of its use in an ongoing research project, demonstrating how it achieves the methodological rigour necessary to meet quality criteria for grounded theory. The paper concludes by considering the limitations of the CRG-EFR method compared to classical EFR, identifying CRG-EFR as ideal suited for transformative futures research in which culturally embedded insights are foundational to images of the future . • Presents Critical Realist Grounded - Ethnographic Futures Research (CRG-EFR) as a development of Ethnographic Futures Research. • Provides new insights on critical realism as an ontology and epistemology of future studies and its role in prediction. • Demonstrates how grounded theory can be applied in futures research by integrating it with EFR to build scenarios. • Demonstrates how CRG-EFR enhances the theoretical depth and methodological rigour of Ethnographic Futures Research.

FuturesVol. 175
Loughborough University (GB), Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.