The algorithmic mirror: Academic libraries under the gaze of artificial intelligence - stereotypes, invisibilities, and the critical (re)construction of professional identities

Background Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative systems such as ChatGPT, DALL-E, and Midjourney, has rapidly become a socio-technical actor that not only mediates information but also shapes cultural imaginaries of professional identity Purpose This study examines how AI intersects with stereotypes, invisibility, and the (re)construction of professional identities in academic librarianship Research Design A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA protocol. Study Sample Records were retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus covering the period 2020–2025. Data Collection and/or Analysis A total of 775 records were screened, and 63 articles were included in the final analysis Results The review revealed a striking absence of explicit engagement with academic librarians, even within the growing body of work on AI in higher education and knowledge work. When libraries were addressed, they were framed primarily as sites of technological implementation rather than as epistemic communities. This silence signifies the epistemic marginalization of librarianship within discourses of AI adoption and ethics Conclusions AI functions as an algorithmic mirror: amplifying reductive stereotypes, privileging functionalist narratives, and rendering invisible librarians’ pedagogical, ethical, and curatorial roles. This absence underscores the urgency of repositioning librarianship within debates on AI, not as a residual service domain, but as a central interlocutor in negotiating the cultural politics of algorithmic futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alexandria The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09557490251386269
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The algorithmic mirror: Academic libraries under the gaze of artificial intelligence - stereotypes, invisibilities, and the critical (re)construction of professional identities

Nuno Miguel Teixeira Sousa
1 citations
Alexandria The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

The algorithmic mirror: Academic libraries under the gaze of artificial intelligence - stereotypes, invisibilities, and the critical (re)construction of professional identities

Nuno Miguel Teixeira Sousa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative systems such as ChatGPT, DALL-E, and Midjourney, has rapidly become a socio-technical actor that not only mediates information but also shapes cultural imaginaries of professional identity Purpose This study examines how AI intersects with stereotypes, invisibility, and the (re)construction of professional identities in academic librarianship Research Design A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA protocol. Study Sample Records were retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus covering the period 2020–2025. Data Collection and/or Analysis A total of 775 records were screened, and 63 articles were included in the final analysis Results The review revealed a striking absence of explicit engagement with academic librarians, even within the growing body of work on AI in higher education and knowledge work. When libraries were addressed, they were framed primarily as sites of technological implementation rather than as epistemic communities. This silence signifies the epistemic marginalization of librarianship within discourses of AI adoption and ethics Conclusions AI functions as an algorithmic mirror: amplifying reductive stereotypes, privileging functionalist narratives, and rendering invisible librarians’ pedagogical, ethical, and curatorial roles. This absence underscores the urgency of repositioning librarianship within debates on AI, not as a residual service domain, but as a central interlocutor in negotiating the cultural politics of algorithmic futures.

Alexandria The Journal of National and International Library and Information IssuesVol. 35(3)
University of Lisbon (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.