InfoOOD: information bottleneck optimization for post hoc medical image out-of-distribution detection

<i>Objective.</i>Deep learning models are prone to failure when inferring upon out-of-distribution (OOD) data, i.e. data whose features fundamentally differ from those in the training set. Existing OOD measures often lack sensitivity to the subtle image variations encountered within clinical settings. In this work, we investigate a post hoc, information-based approach to OOD detection-termed<i>InfoOOD</i>-which iteratively quantifies the amount of embedded feature information that can be shared between the training data and test data without degrading the model output.<i>Approach.</i>Abdominal CT images from patients with metastatic liver lesions were used. A 3D U-Net was trained to segment liver organs and lesions using<i>N</i>= 157 images. Physics-based artifacts-low dose, sparse view angles, and rings artifacts-were simulated on a separate set of<i>N</i>= 40 test images at three intensity magnitudes. Segmentation performance and the ability of the<i>InfoOOD</i>measure to detect the artifact-induced OOD data were evaluated. An additional<i>N</i>= 131 test images were used to assess the correlation between the<i>InfoOOD</i>measure and segmentation model performance metrics. In all evaluations,<i>InfoOOD</i>was compared with established embedded feature-based and reconstruction-based OOD detection methods.<i>Results.</i>Artifact simulation significantly degraded segmentation model performance across all artifact types and magnitudes (<i>ρ</i>< 0.001), with model performance worsening as artifact magnitude increased. The<i>InfoOOD</i>measure consistently outperformed the embedded feature-based measures in detecting OOD data (e.g. AUC = 0.93 vs. AUC = 0.57 for the strong rings artifact) and surpassed the reconstruction-based measure across weak magnitude artifacts (e.g., AUC = 0.75 vs. AUC = 0.61 for the weak sparse view artifact). The<i>InfoOOD</i>measure also achieved stronger, negative correlations with segmentation performance metrics (e.g.,<i>ρ</i>=-0.52 vs.<i>ρ</i>⩾-0.11 for the lesion sensitivity metric). In both assessments,<i>InfoOOD</i>measure performance increased considerably with information bottleneck optimization iterations.<i>Significance.</i>This work introduces and validates a novel, highly sensitive, and clinically relevant information-theoretic approach for medical image OOD detection, supporting the safe deployment of deep learning models in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae110e
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

InfoOOD: information bottleneck optimization for post hoc medical image out-of-distribution detection

Brayden Schott, Xin Tie, Robert Jeraj, S Sebastian et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

InfoOOD: information bottleneck optimization for post hoc medical image out-of-distribution detection

Brayden Schott, Xin Tie, Robert Jeraj, S Sebastian, Alison Deatsch, Victor Santoro-Fernandes, Žan Klaneček
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Deep learning models are prone to failure when inferring upon out-of-distribution (OOD) data, i.e. data whose features fundamentally differ from those in the training set. Existing OOD measures often lack sensitivity to the subtle image variations encountered within clinical settings. In this work, we investigate a post hoc, information-based approach to OOD detection-termed<i>InfoOOD</i>-which iteratively quantifies the amount of embedded feature information that can be shared between the training data and test data without degrading the model output.<i>Approach.</i>Abdominal CT images from patients with metastatic liver lesions were used. A 3D U-Net was trained to segment liver organs and lesions using<i>N</i>= 157 images. Physics-based artifacts-low dose, sparse view angles, and rings artifacts-were simulated on a separate set of<i>N</i>= 40 test images at three intensity magnitudes. Segmentation performance and the ability of the<i>InfoOOD</i>measure to detect the artifact-induced OOD data were evaluated. An additional<i>N</i>= 131 test images were used to assess the correlation between the<i>InfoOOD</i>measure and segmentation model performance metrics. In all evaluations,<i>InfoOOD</i>was compared with established embedded feature-based and reconstruction-based OOD detection methods.<i>Results.</i>Artifact simulation significantly degraded segmentation model performance across all artifact types and magnitudes (<i>ρ</i>< 0.001), with model performance worsening as artifact magnitude increased. The<i>InfoOOD</i>measure consistently outperformed the embedded feature-based measures in detecting OOD data (e.g. AUC = 0.93 vs. AUC = 0.57 for the strong rings artifact) and surpassed the reconstruction-based measure across weak magnitude artifacts (e.g., AUC = 0.75 vs. AUC = 0.61 for the weak sparse view artifact). The<i>InfoOOD</i>measure also achieved stronger, negative correlations with segmentation performance metrics (e.g.,<i>ρ</i>=-0.52 vs.<i>ρ</i>⩾-0.11 for the lesion sensitivity metric). In both assessments,<i>InfoOOD</i>measure performance increased considerably with information bottleneck optimization iterations.<i>Significance.</i>This work introduces and validates a novel, highly sensitive, and clinically relevant information-theoretic approach for medical image OOD detection, supporting the safe deployment of deep learning models in clinical settings.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(21)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Ljubljana (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.