Utility of quantitative pathologic analysis of pT1 colorectal carcinomas to improve prediction of lymph node metastasis

According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), submucosally invasive (pT1) colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) should be evaluated for tumor grade, lymphatic invasion, and tumor budding to determine the risk of lymph node metastasis. The presence of any one of these high-risk features is an indication for surgery in endoscopically removed pT1 CRCs. In this study, we determined if quantitative pathologic analysis with the QuantCRC algorithm can augment NCCN risk stratification in a multi-institutional cohort of 512 surgically resected pT1 CRC. LASSO regression identified %high-grade, %inflammatory stroma (stromal area), and %tumor budding/poorly differentiated clusters (%TB/PDC) as important QuantCRC features and were used in subsequent logistic regression analysis. Five logistic regression models were built using NCCN and QuantCRC variables, with the combined NCCN + QuantCRC model providing the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.81). A predicted probability cutoff of 0.092 provided a sensitivity of 78.3% and specificity of 62.1% in the NCCN + QuantCRC model with a 24.3% rate of lymph node positivity for high-risk (HR) tumors compared to 5.2% for low-risk (LR) CRCs. Fifteen pT1 CRCs were reclassified from NCCN LR to NCCN + QuantCRC HR and 3/15 (20%) demonstrated lymph node positivity. The median predicted probability of lymph node metastasis in the NCCN + QuantCRC model was used to define two HR groups (HR1: 0.092-0.218 and HR2: > 0.218). HR2 CRCs had a rate of lymph node positivity of 31.5% compared to 17.1% for HR1 CRCs (P = 0.02). Lastly, the NCCN + QuantCRC model was validated in a cohort of 29 endoscopically resected pT1 CRCs followed by surgical resection. In the NCCN + QuantCRC model, the 8 pN + CRCs in this cohort had a higher median predicted probability of lymph node metastasis compared to 21 pN0 CRCs (0.219 vs. 0.080, P = 0.04). In summary, the addition of variables from QuantCRC can improve risk stratification of pT1 CRCs over NCCN criteria alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04284-2
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of quantitative pathologic analysis of pT1 colorectal carcinomas to improve prediction of lymph node metastasis

Catherine E. Hagen, Steven Gallinger, Carol J. Swallow, David P. Cyr et al.
Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Utility of quantitative pathologic analysis of pT1 colorectal carcinomas to improve prediction of lymph node metastasis

Catherine E. Hagen, Steven Gallinger, Carol J. Swallow, David P. Cyr, Sameer Shivji, Amanda I. Phipps, Thomas Westerling, Heidi Kosiorek, Reetesh K. Pai, Rondell Patrell Graham, James Conner, Loı̈c Le Marchand, Rish K. Pai, Daniel D. Buchanan, N. Jewel Samadder, Richard Kirsch, Robert C. Grant, Mark A. Jenkins, Christina Wu, Priya Priyadarshini Nayak
article en

Abstract

According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), submucosally invasive (pT1) colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) should be evaluated for tumor grade, lymphatic invasion, and tumor budding to determine the risk of lymph node metastasis. The presence of any one of these high-risk features is an indication for surgery in endoscopically removed pT1 CRCs. In this study, we determined if quantitative pathologic analysis with the QuantCRC algorithm can augment NCCN risk stratification in a multi-institutional cohort of 512 surgically resected pT1 CRC. LASSO regression identified %high-grade, %inflammatory stroma (stromal area), and %tumor budding/poorly differentiated clusters (%TB/PDC) as important QuantCRC features and were used in subsequent logistic regression analysis. Five logistic regression models were built using NCCN and QuantCRC variables, with the combined NCCN + QuantCRC model providing the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.81). A predicted probability cutoff of 0.092 provided a sensitivity of 78.3% and specificity of 62.1% in the NCCN + QuantCRC model with a 24.3% rate of lymph node positivity for high-risk (HR) tumors compared to 5.2% for low-risk (LR) CRCs. Fifteen pT1 CRCs were reclassified from NCCN LR to NCCN + QuantCRC HR and 3/15 (20%) demonstrated lymph node positivity. The median predicted probability of lymph node metastasis in the NCCN + QuantCRC model was used to define two HR groups (HR1: 0.092-0.218 and HR2: > 0.218). HR2 CRCs had a rate of lymph node positivity of 31.5% compared to 17.1% for HR1 CRCs (P = 0.02). Lastly, the NCCN + QuantCRC model was validated in a cohort of 29 endoscopically resected pT1 CRCs followed by surgical resection. In the NCCN + QuantCRC model, the 8 pN + CRCs in this cohort had a higher median predicted probability of lymph node metastasis compared to 21 pN0 CRCs (0.219 vs. 0.080, P = 0.04). In summary, the addition of variables from QuantCRC can improve risk stratification of pT1 CRCs over NCCN criteria alone.

Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA), Mount Sinai Hospital (CA), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), University Health Network (CA), Hawaii Pacific University (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Toronto (CA), University of Washington (US), Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute (CA), WinnMed (US), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (AU), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Sinai Health System (CA), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.