Advanced treatment strategies for challenging radioactive Wastes: Recent Developments and future directions

• Detailed comparative analysis of treatment methods for diverse challenging wastes. • Case study insights illustrate upscaling obstacles and costly delays. • Challenges remain for scaling up, regulatory approval and stakeholder acceptance. • Harmonized and flexible regulations are needed to deploy new treatment solutions. • Hybrid and modular systems offer tailored solutions for diverse radioactive waste streams. The management of low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste (LILW) presents increasing challenges, particularly for waste streams with complex chemistries, variable radioactivity, or combined toxic and radiological risks. Conventional treatment methods, while effective for conventional waste types, are often inadequate for these problematic streams, which require advanced and tailored approaches. This review evaluates recent progress in thermal (pyrolysis, plasma processes, fluidized bed steam reforming, molten salt oxidation) and chemical technologies (wet and electrochemical oxidation) for treating such wastes. The novelty of this work lies in its integrated analysis, which combines comparative technology mapping with assessments of scalability, regulatory and societal acceptance, and the integration of lifecycle environmental and economic metrics. Cross-technology performance matrices are presented to support process selection, together with a strategic research roadmap that prioritizes secondary waste minimization, flexible acceptance criteria, and the inclusion of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The study also highlights future trends such as mobile modular treatment systems, hybrid technologies that integrate multiple treatment approaches, and the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies for real-time monitoring and process optimization. Overall, this review aims to provide a practical framework to guide researchers, industry, and regulators toward safe, sustainable, and industrially viable solutions for complex radioactive waste management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114501
Primary Topic
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced treatment strategies for challenging radioactive Wastes: Recent Developments and future directions

B. Zlobenko, Mafalda Guerra, Μ. M. Cowper, Quoc Tri Phung et al.
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
article

Advanced treatment strategies for challenging radioactive Wastes: Recent Developments and future directions

B. Zlobenko, Mafalda Guerra, Μ. M. Cowper, Quoc Tri Phung, Alan H. Tkaczyk, Estrella Álvarez, Federica Pancotti, M. Kala, Michael Gracey, Janno Torop
article en

Abstract

• Detailed comparative analysis of treatment methods for diverse challenging wastes. • Case study insights illustrate upscaling obstacles and costly delays. • Challenges remain for scaling up, regulatory approval and stakeholder acceptance. • Harmonized and flexible regulations are needed to deploy new treatment solutions. • Hybrid and modular systems offer tailored solutions for diverse radioactive waste streams. The management of low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste (LILW) presents increasing challenges, particularly for waste streams with complex chemistries, variable radioactivity, or combined toxic and radiological risks. Conventional treatment methods, while effective for conventional waste types, are often inadequate for these problematic streams, which require advanced and tailored approaches. This review evaluates recent progress in thermal (pyrolysis, plasma processes, fluidized bed steam reforming, molten salt oxidation) and chemical technologies (wet and electrochemical oxidation) for treating such wastes. The novelty of this work lies in its integrated analysis, which combines comparative technology mapping with assessments of scalability, regulatory and societal acceptance, and the integration of lifecycle environmental and economic metrics. Cross-technology performance matrices are presented to support process selection, together with a strategic research roadmap that prioritizes secondary waste minimization, flexible acceptance criteria, and the inclusion of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The study also highlights future trends such as mobile modular treatment systems, hybrid technologies that integrate multiple treatment approaches, and the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies for real-time monitoring and process optimization. Overall, this review aims to provide a practical framework to guide researchers, industry, and regulators toward safe, sustainable, and industrially viable solutions for complex radioactive waste management.

Nuclear Engineering and DesignVol. 445
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Sogin (Italy) (IT), Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (BE), Palladin Institute of Biochemistry (UA), Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (ES), University of Tartu (EE), University of Cumbria (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.