An Evaluation of the ASME Flange Design Method for Large Diameter Bolted Joints

Abstract Poor industry experience with large diameter flanges has led to a perception that existing design methods may be inadequate to account for the actual stresses and displacements that occur in service or during hydrostatic testing. The ASME method for design of tapered hub flanges with gaskets located inside the bolt circle, as found in Section VIII Div. 1 Appendix 2 and Div. 2 4.16, does not place any limit on the diameter of the flange which may be designed, nor does it make any adjustments for diameter as found in PD5500. The ASME Method, commonly called the Taylor Forge Method, makes certain simplifications in the solution of the relevant differential equations, in the interest of practical computation. Past studies have identified problems related to these simplifications, resulting in inadequate analysis of the response of the structure to internal pressure loading. In this work, a parametric study is performed on a large number of randomly generated flange geometries. Flange stresses calculated using the ASME method are compared to more accurate methods, and the resulting dataset analyzed for correlation between the diameter and inaccuracy in the ASME method. The influence of mechanical interaction (accounting for the pressure-ballooning of the attached pipe or shell) is also investigated as an enhancement to the ASME method. The study does not find a fundamental problem with the ASME method as flange diameter increases. However, the study does identify certain pitfalls in practical design of large diameter flanges and makes recommendations for improving these designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2025-154675
Primary Topic
Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evaluation of the ASME Flange Design Method for Large Diameter Bolted Joints

Gys van Zyl, Chris W. Cary, D. F. T. Nash
Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
article

An Evaluation of the ASME Flange Design Method for Large Diameter Bolted Joints

Gys van Zyl, Chris W. Cary, D. F. T. Nash
article en

Abstract

Abstract Poor industry experience with large diameter flanges has led to a perception that existing design methods may be inadequate to account for the actual stresses and displacements that occur in service or during hydrostatic testing. The ASME method for design of tapered hub flanges with gaskets located inside the bolt circle, as found in Section VIII Div. 1 Appendix 2 and Div. 2 4.16, does not place any limit on the diameter of the flange which may be designed, nor does it make any adjustments for diameter as found in PD5500. The ASME Method, commonly called the Taylor Forge Method, makes certain simplifications in the solution of the relevant differential equations, in the interest of practical computation. Past studies have identified problems related to these simplifications, resulting in inadequate analysis of the response of the structure to internal pressure loading. In this work, a parametric study is performed on a large number of randomly generated flange geometries. Flange stresses calculated using the ASME method are compared to more accurate methods, and the resulting dataset analyzed for correlation between the diameter and inaccuracy in the ASME method. The influence of mechanical interaction (accounting for the pressure-ballooning of the attached pipe or shell) is also investigated as an enhancement to the ASME method. The study does not find a fundamental problem with the ASME method as flange diameter increases. However, the study does identify certain pitfalls in practical design of large diameter flanges and makes recommendations for improving these designs.

University of Strathclyde (GB), Integrity Systems (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.