Parsimonious Uncertainty Quantification for Modeling and Simulation of Flow-Induced Vibrations

Abstract Uncertainties pervade the process of constructing credible computational models, generating simulation results, and interpretation thereof. One must compare simulation results with experiment results, which intend to represent the real world environment (e.g., model validation via correspondence with observations). One must additionally compare the conceptual and mathematical models by which we represent the real world and how those models become encoded on a computer (e.g., model verification via consistency with first principles). Those evaluations of real-world correspondence and phenomenological consistency represent two necessary and distinct approaches to uncertainty quantification. Systems, structures, and components subject to stochastic dynamics, such as flow-induced vibration of piping and pressure vessel systems, necessitate additional and unique approaches to this puzzle. We therefore illustrate an approach to verify, validate, and quantify uncertainty for a structure subject to flow-induced vibrations and discuss how this problem can both leverage existing standards, as well as objectively demonstrate compliance to design objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2025-154994
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parsimonious Uncertainty Quantification for Modeling and Simulation of Flow-Induced Vibrations

Gregory A. Banyay, A. NEJAD
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

Parsimonious Uncertainty Quantification for Modeling and Simulation of Flow-Induced Vibrations

Gregory A. Banyay, A. NEJAD
article en

Abstract

Abstract Uncertainties pervade the process of constructing credible computational models, generating simulation results, and interpretation thereof. One must compare simulation results with experiment results, which intend to represent the real world environment (e.g., model validation via correspondence with observations). One must additionally compare the conceptual and mathematical models by which we represent the real world and how those models become encoded on a computer (e.g., model verification via consistency with first principles). Those evaluations of real-world correspondence and phenomenological consistency represent two necessary and distinct approaches to uncertainty quantification. Systems, structures, and components subject to stochastic dynamics, such as flow-induced vibration of piping and pressure vessel systems, necessitate additional and unique approaches to this puzzle. We therefore illustrate an approach to verify, validate, and quantify uncertainty for a structure subject to flow-induced vibrations and discuss how this problem can both leverage existing standards, as well as objectively demonstrate compliance to design objectives.

Pennsylvania State University (US), Structural Integrity Associates (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.