Outcomes and costs in specialized burn care: Adapting the Quality Cost Indicator (QCI) model for burn care

The Quality Cost Indicator (QCI) model supports value-based health care at the institutional level, by calculating disease-specific health outcomes per unit cost over time. The aim of this study was to adapt the QCI model for specialized burn care (the BC-QCI model) and explore its utilization using real-world data. Burn care outcome indicators were selected through an iterative process with multiple stakeholders. Threshold values were established per outcome indicator and average total healthcare costs were calculated. A cohort of adult burn patients (n = 1449) admitted for at least one day and/or had undergone surgery in Dutch burn centers between 2020 and 2023 was used, with a follow-up period of 12 months. The proportion of patients who achieved textbook outcome (i.e., having achieved all the outcome indicators), the average total costs per patient, and QCI values were calculated. Of all patients, 54% achieved all five outcome indicators (i.e., length of stay, wound infections, other complications, discharge destination, and predicted mortality). The most successful outcome indicator was 'predicted mortality' (passed by 99% of the population), the least successful outcome indicator was 'length of stay' (62%). The patients who failed to achieve one or more outcome indicators (46%) had significantly higher average total costs compared to the patients who achieved textbook outcome (54%) (€50,134 [€47,810-€52,850] vs. €11,721 [€11,096-€12,429]). The BC-QCI model is a solid foundation to provide insights into the outcomes and costs for specialized burn care at the institutional level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333660
Primary Topic
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes and costs in specialized burn care: Adapting the Quality Cost Indicator (QCI) model for burn care

Margriet E. van Baar, Willem H. P. van Veghel, Denise van Uden, Cornelis H. van der Vlies et al.
PLoS ONE
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
article

Outcomes and costs in specialized burn care: Adapting the Quality Cost Indicator (QCI) model for burn care

Margriet E. van Baar, Willem H. P. van Veghel, Denise van Uden, Cornelis H. van der Vlies, M.K. Nieuwenhuis, Anouk Pijpe, A. Weel, Jean-Bart Bügel, Raaba S. M. Thambithurai
article en

Abstract

The Quality Cost Indicator (QCI) model supports value-based health care at the institutional level, by calculating disease-specific health outcomes per unit cost over time. The aim of this study was to adapt the QCI model for specialized burn care (the BC-QCI model) and explore its utilization using real-world data. Burn care outcome indicators were selected through an iterative process with multiple stakeholders. Threshold values were established per outcome indicator and average total healthcare costs were calculated. A cohort of adult burn patients (n = 1449) admitted for at least one day and/or had undergone surgery in Dutch burn centers between 2020 and 2023 was used, with a follow-up period of 12 months. The proportion of patients who achieved textbook outcome (i.e., having achieved all the outcome indicators), the average total costs per patient, and QCI values were calculated. Of all patients, 54% achieved all five outcome indicators (i.e., length of stay, wound infections, other complications, discharge destination, and predicted mortality). The most successful outcome indicator was 'predicted mortality' (passed by 99% of the population), the least successful outcome indicator was 'length of stay' (62%). The patients who failed to achieve one or more outcome indicators (46%) had significantly higher average total costs compared to the patients who achieved textbook outcome (54%) (€50,134 [€47,810-€52,850] vs. €11,721 [€11,096-€12,429]). The BC-QCI model is a solid foundation to provide insights into the outcomes and costs for specialized burn care at the institutional level.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Hanze University of Applied Sciences (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Tissue Regeneration Systems (United States) (US), Sint Franciscus Gasthuis (NL), Red Cross Hospital (GR), Maasstad Ziekenhuis (NL), Association of Dutch Burn Centres (NL), Franciscus Vlietland (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.