Balancing service provision by EV aggregator in different TSO-DSO coordination schemes

The increasing penetration of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) in the distribution system has led to the emergence of a new market actor - the aggregator. Aggregator serves as a facilitator, enabling flexibility asset owners to access various markets. Among them, electric vehicle (EV) aggregators are gaining more attention due to their expanding use and potential to provide services across multiple markets, particularly in the reserve market. Currently, the transmission system operator (TSO) indirectly utilizes the resources under the management of the distribution system operators (DSO), which can negatively impact the distribution grid. Conversely, adjustments from DSOs can impact service provision to TSO due to the shortage of TSO usage information. These factors highlight the importance of evaluating the service provision from aggregators under different TSO-DSO coordination schemes. This paper focuses on the provision of flexibility from electric vehicles (EVs) aggregators for balancing service in the TSO-DSO hybrid-managed scheme and compares it to the DSO-managed coordination schemes. The behavior of aggregators reacting to price fluctuations and TSO requests under different coordination schemes and simulation scenarios is thoroughly assessed. Additionally, their impact on the grid is analyzed through the DSO’s congestion management process and validated using data from a real part of the Dutch distribution network. Results find that the hybrid-managed coordination scheme gives more benefit to the aggregator than the DSO-managed scheme, and the price paid for the BRP for the deviation has a large impact on the aggregator’s behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/powertech59965.2025.11180333
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing service provision by EV aggregator in different TSO-DSO coordination schemes

Koen Kok, Hang K. Nguyen, Nguyen Phuong Dung
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Balancing service provision by EV aggregator in different TSO-DSO coordination schemes

Koen Kok, Hang K. Nguyen, Nguyen Phuong Dung
article en

Abstract

The increasing penetration of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) in the distribution system has led to the emergence of a new market actor - the aggregator. Aggregator serves as a facilitator, enabling flexibility asset owners to access various markets. Among them, electric vehicle (EV) aggregators are gaining more attention due to their expanding use and potential to provide services across multiple markets, particularly in the reserve market. Currently, the transmission system operator (TSO) indirectly utilizes the resources under the management of the distribution system operators (DSO), which can negatively impact the distribution grid. Conversely, adjustments from DSOs can impact service provision to TSO due to the shortage of TSO usage information. These factors highlight the importance of evaluating the service provision from aggregators under different TSO-DSO coordination schemes. This paper focuses on the provision of flexibility from electric vehicles (EVs) aggregators for balancing service in the TSO-DSO hybrid-managed scheme and compares it to the DSO-managed coordination schemes. The behavior of aggregators reacting to price fluctuations and TSO requests under different coordination schemes and simulation scenarios is thoroughly assessed. Additionally, their impact on the grid is analyzed through the DSO’s congestion management process and validated using data from a real part of the Dutch distribution network. Results find that the hybrid-managed coordination scheme gives more benefit to the aggregator than the DSO-managed scheme, and the price paid for the BRP for the deviation has a large impact on the aggregator’s behavior.

Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.