Comparison of Current-Limiting Strategies for Grid-Forming Converters Under Grid Faults

This paper investigates the performance of three state-of-the-art current-limiting strategies for grid-forming (GFM) converters under grid faults. These highly effective strategies include virtual admittance control, virtual admittance control enhanced with virtual power feedback, and the recently developed cross-forming control. The performance comparison addresses two crucial requirements for GFM converters under grid faults, namely transient stability and reactive current injection. The comparison indicates that the virtual admittance control enhanced with virtual power feedback shows the most promising transient stability performance, while the cross-forming control exhibits superior reactive current injection performance. Thus, individual benefits of each strategy can be obtained by properly combining them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/powertech59965.2025.11180244
Primary Topic
HVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Current-Limiting Strategies for Grid-Forming Converters Under Grid Faults

Xiuqiang He, Gabriela Hug, M. Desai, Florian Dörfler et al.
HVDC Systems and Fault Protection
article

Comparison of Current-Limiting Strategies for Grid-Forming Converters Under Grid Faults

Xiuqiang He, Gabriela Hug, M. Desai, Florian Dörfler, R.L. Stoll
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the performance of three state-of-the-art current-limiting strategies for grid-forming (GFM) converters under grid faults. These highly effective strategies include virtual admittance control, virtual admittance control enhanced with virtual power feedback, and the recently developed cross-forming control. The performance comparison addresses two crucial requirements for GFM converters under grid faults, namely transient stability and reactive current injection. The comparison indicates that the virtual admittance control enhanced with virtual power feedback shows the most promising transient stability performance, while the cross-forming control exhibits superior reactive current injection performance. Thus, individual benefits of each strategy can be obtained by properly combining them.

ETH Zurich (CH), SystemsX.ch (CH), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
HVDC Systems and Fault Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Current-Limiting Strategies for Grid-Forming Converters Under Grid Faults — Xiuqiang He, Gabriela Hug, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS