Comparison of Environmental Impacts of AC, DC and Mixed Distribution Networks

The electrification growth has led to an increasing number of DC devices, such as PV panels and electric vehicle chargers. This revives the option of a DC distribution network, or rather mixed AC-DC network. The comparison between such alternatives needs to take into account the environmental impacts associated with the manufacture of specific power electronics devices. This article proposes a comparison of the fabrication impacts and losses of three technical choices for low-voltage electrical grids: DC, AC and mixed AC/DC. A case study is chosen based on typical mixed consumer-width distributed energy sources. Simulations are performed over 20-year period for each of the three architectures. This study finds that a mixed topology can be a promising alternative to traditional AC grids, as it reduces converter impacts, especially for short cable lengths. However, the optimal architecture for a given system can vary depending on factors such as nominal power, cable length, and consumption profile. To explore this variability, a detailed sensitivity analysis is performed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/powertech59965.2025.11180643
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Environmental Impacts of AC, DC and Mixed Distribution Networks

Tanguy Simon, Jean‐François Trégouët, Hamid Ben Ahmed, Gurvan Jodin et al.
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Comparison of Environmental Impacts of AC, DC and Mixed Distribution Networks

Tanguy Simon, Jean‐François Trégouët, Hamid Ben Ahmed, Gurvan Jodin, Vincenzo Greco, Xuefang Lin-Shi, Jean-Yves Gauthier, Roman Le Goff Latimier, Lukas Cafran, Bernardo Taulois Braga
article en

Abstract

The electrification growth has led to an increasing number of DC devices, such as PV panels and electric vehicle chargers. This revives the option of a DC distribution network, or rather mixed AC-DC network. The comparison between such alternatives needs to take into account the environmental impacts associated with the manufacture of specific power electronics devices. This article proposes a comparison of the fabrication impacts and losses of three technical choices for low-voltage electrical grids: DC, AC and mixed AC/DC. A case study is chosen based on typical mixed consumer-width distributed energy sources. Simulations are performed over 20-year period for each of the three architectures. This study finds that a mixed topology can be a promising alternative to traditional AC grids, as it reduces converter impacts, especially for short cable lengths. However, the optimal architecture for a given system can vary depending on factors such as nominal power, cable length, and consumption profile. To explore this variability, a detailed sensitivity analysis is performed.

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Rennes 2 (FR), Laboratoire d'Automatique, de Génie des Procédés et de Génie Pharmaceutique (FR), Laboratoire Ampère (FR), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (FR), Université de Rennes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Environmental Impacts of AC, DC and Mixed Distribution Networks — Tanguy Simon, Jean‐François Trégouët, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS