Comparison of indirect and descriptive methods of functional behavior assessment in adults with intellectual disability

Adults with intellectual disability exhibit challenging behavior more frequently than the population with typical development. Functional behavior assessment is an effective and scientifically-based way of reducing individual challenging behavior. Two types of methods are used in the functional behavior assessment process: indirect and descriptive. Aim. The purpose of this research was to examine the consistency between the results obtained using both methods. Methods. A multiple case study included three adults with moderate intellectual disability. Two people were 18 years old and one person was 19 years old. All three people showed different forms of challenging behavior. Data was collected using indirect and descriptive methods. We compared the findings of the function of the challenging behavior using both methods. Although three participants were included in the study, we collected data related to the function of behavior for four different forms of challenging behavior. Results. In the case of the first participant, the same function of problematic behavior, 'disobeying the rules', was determined by using both methods of functional behavior assessment, which was 'getting attention'. In the case of the second participant, only one form of problematic behavior, 'talking to oneself', obtained the same function of problematic behavior, which was 'getting attention', while another form of problematic behavior, 'repeating the same phrases', obtained a different function. In the case of the third participant, different results were obtained for problematic behavior 'non-cooperation'. Conclusion. The research showed that data related to the function of challenging behavior were consistent only in two cases (50%). Considering the obtained results, the results about the function of problematic behavior obtained using only one method of functional assessment of behavior should be interpreted with caution.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh24-56692
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of indirect and descriptive methods of functional behavior assessment in adults with intellectual disability

Maja Simnjanovski, Erna Žgur
Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Comparison of indirect and descriptive methods of functional behavior assessment in adults with intellectual disability

Maja Simnjanovski, Erna Žgur
article en

Abstract

Adults with intellectual disability exhibit challenging behavior more frequently than the population with typical development. Functional behavior assessment is an effective and scientifically-based way of reducing individual challenging behavior. Two types of methods are used in the functional behavior assessment process: indirect and descriptive. Aim. The purpose of this research was to examine the consistency between the results obtained using both methods. Methods. A multiple case study included three adults with moderate intellectual disability. Two people were 18 years old and one person was 19 years old. All three people showed different forms of challenging behavior. Data was collected using indirect and descriptive methods. We compared the findings of the function of the challenging behavior using both methods. Although three participants were included in the study, we collected data related to the function of behavior for four different forms of challenging behavior. Results. In the case of the first participant, the same function of problematic behavior, 'disobeying the rules', was determined by using both methods of functional behavior assessment, which was 'getting attention'. In the case of the second participant, only one form of problematic behavior, 'talking to oneself', obtained the same function of problematic behavior, which was 'getting attention', while another form of problematic behavior, 'repeating the same phrases', obtained a different function. In the case of the third participant, different results were obtained for problematic behavior 'non-cooperation'. Conclusion. The research showed that data related to the function of challenging behavior were consistent only in two cases (50%). Considering the obtained results, the results about the function of problematic behavior obtained using only one method of functional assessment of behavior should be interpreted with caution.

Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacijaVol. 24(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.