The Prison in Power: Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment (2015)

The Stanford Prison Experiment remains one of psychology’s most cited yet ethically contested studies. This essay re-examines the experiment and the movie through a psychological and philosophical lens, questioning the boundaries between obedience and systemic power. It investigates how ordinary individuals when placed within dehumanizing systems of control can internalize power and cruelty, blurring the lines between victim and oppressor. Integrating insights from Bandura, Foucault, Nietzsche, it argues that the true significance of Zimbardo’s work lies not in its methodology but in its enduring question: how does one remain “good” in an environment that rewards apathy? Ultimately, the essay calls for the cultivation of moral consciousness and responsibility, especially in the new age of AI, when confronted with systemic pressures that strip humanity of its ethical bearings.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/r9y4e_v1
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prison in Power: Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment (2015)

Sanskriti Sharma
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

The Prison in Power: Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment (2015)

Sanskriti Sharma
article en

Abstract

The Stanford Prison Experiment remains one of psychology’s most cited yet ethically contested studies. This essay re-examines the experiment and the movie through a psychological and philosophical lens, questioning the boundaries between obedience and systemic power. It investigates how ordinary individuals when placed within dehumanizing systems of control can internalize power and cruelty, blurring the lines between victim and oppressor. Integrating insights from Bandura, Foucault, Nietzsche, it argues that the true significance of Zimbardo’s work lies not in its methodology but in its enduring question: how does one remain “good” in an environment that rewards apathy? Ultimately, the essay calls for the cultivation of moral consciousness and responsibility, especially in the new age of AI, when confronted with systemic pressures that strip humanity of its ethical bearings.

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.