The stigma of counternormative prosociality

People shy away from prosocial behavior because it costs money, time, or emotional and cognitive resources. We argue that there is another, less studied, and sometimes counterintuitive cost to prosociality: its stigmatization by external observers when such behavior counters established social norms. We review findings previously studied as separate entities in order to explain how prosocial behavior, and those who engage in it, may be stigmatized when their prosociality can be perceived as counternormative. Specifically, 1) we review literature that highlights the importance of selfish and selfless norms, 2) we explain why devaluation of prosocial behavior can be additionally understood as a reaction to counternormativity when one perceives a violation of such norms, and 3) discuss the importance of taking the stigmatization of counternormative prosociality into account and examining its broader implications when interpreting social psychological findings on prosocial behavior. Lastly, we briefly highlight fruitful intervention approaches and future directions.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qfpnb_v1
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The stigma of counternormative prosociality

Desmond C. Ong, Daryl Cameron, Tatiana Lau, Eliana Hadjiandreou
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

The stigma of counternormative prosociality

Desmond C. Ong, Daryl Cameron, Tatiana Lau, Eliana Hadjiandreou
article en

Abstract

People shy away from prosocial behavior because it costs money, time, or emotional and cognitive resources. We argue that there is another, less studied, and sometimes counterintuitive cost to prosociality: its stigmatization by external observers when such behavior counters established social norms. We review findings previously studied as separate entities in order to explain how prosocial behavior, and those who engage in it, may be stigmatized when their prosociality can be perceived as counternormative. Specifically, 1) we review literature that highlights the importance of selfish and selfless norms, 2) we explain why devaluation of prosocial behavior can be additionally understood as a reaction to counternormativity when one perceives a violation of such norms, and 3) discuss the importance of taking the stigmatization of counternormative prosociality into account and examining its broader implications when interpreting social psychological findings on prosocial behavior. Lastly, we briefly highlight fruitful intervention approaches and future directions.

Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The stigma of counternormative prosociality — Desmond C. Ong, Daryl Cameron, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS