Dynamics of vision: Grouping takes longer than crowding

Vision is often understood as a hierarchical, feedforward process, where visual processing proceeds from low-level features to high-level representations. Within tens of milliseconds, the fundamental features of the percept are established. Traditional models use this framework to explain visual crowding, where nearby elements impair target perception with minimal influence from stimulus duration. Here, we show that, at least for more complex displays, crowding involves highly dynamic processes. We determined vernier offset discrimination thresholds for different flanker configurations. In Experiment 1, for a 160-ms stimulus duration, crowding was lower for flanking Cubes/Rectangles compared to Lines, pointing toward underlying grouping processes. However, strong crowding occurred in all conditions at 20 ms, showing that grouping requires a minimum stimulus duration to occur. In Experiment 2, the crowded vernier (20 ms) was preceded by a 20-ms Cubes display. This brief preview led to uncrowding of the subsequently presented flanked vernier, but only for flankers that ungroup for longer durations (i.e., Cubes). This uncrowding effect occurred for time spans up to 1 s (Experiment 3) but could be interrupted by elements presented between the preview and the flanked vernier (Experiment 4). Our findings are well predicted by the LAMINART model, which employs recurrent segmentation processes unfolding over time to separate objects into distinct representation layers. Taken together, our novel preview effect highlights the importance of spatiotemporal grouping in crowding. In contrast to classic feedforward models, we propose that crowding is a dynamic process where multiple interpretations are modulated and gated by grouping mechanisms evolving over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.12.16
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of vision: Grouping takes longer than crowding

Mauro Manassi, Gregory Francis, Michael Herzog, Martina Morea
1 citations
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
1.43
article

Dynamics of vision: Grouping takes longer than crowding

Mauro Manassi, Gregory Francis, Michael Herzog, Martina Morea
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Vision is often understood as a hierarchical, feedforward process, where visual processing proceeds from low-level features to high-level representations. Within tens of milliseconds, the fundamental features of the percept are established. Traditional models use this framework to explain visual crowding, where nearby elements impair target perception with minimal influence from stimulus duration. Here, we show that, at least for more complex displays, crowding involves highly dynamic processes. We determined vernier offset discrimination thresholds for different flanker configurations. In Experiment 1, for a 160-ms stimulus duration, crowding was lower for flanking Cubes/Rectangles compared to Lines, pointing toward underlying grouping processes. However, strong crowding occurred in all conditions at 20 ms, showing that grouping requires a minimum stimulus duration to occur. In Experiment 2, the crowded vernier (20 ms) was preceded by a 20-ms Cubes display. This brief preview led to uncrowding of the subsequently presented flanked vernier, but only for flankers that ungroup for longer durations (i.e., Cubes). This uncrowding effect occurred for time spans up to 1 s (Experiment 3) but could be interrupted by elements presented between the preview and the flanked vernier (Experiment 4). Our findings are well predicted by the LAMINART model, which employs recurrent segmentation processes unfolding over time to separate objects into distinct representation layers. Taken together, our novel preview effect highlights the importance of spatiotemporal grouping in crowding. In contrast to classic feedforward models, we propose that crowding is a dynamic process where multiple interpretations are modulated and gated by grouping mechanisms evolving over time.

Journal of VisionVol. 25(12)
University of Aberdeen (GB), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Herzog College (IL), King's College Hospital (GB), Martin University Hospital (SK), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.