Green Extraction and Targeted LC-MS Analysis of Biopesticides in Honey Using Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents

Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADES) were synthesized from food-grade components and evaluated as green extractants for the simultaneous recovery and liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (LC-Q-Orbitrap-MS) analysis of biopesticide residues in a complex matrix like honey. Conventional solid-liquid extraction (SLE) was applied, initially using choline chloride-2,3-butanediol (1:4, molar ratio) as the NADES extractant solvent, before systematically evaluating other NADES formulations. Extraction parameters, such as time (10 min, 20 min, and 30 min), technique (rotary mixing vs. sonication), and NADES composition, namely lactic acid-glucose-water (LGH, 5:1:9, molar ratio), lactic acid-glycerol-water (LGLH, 1:1:3, molar ratio), urea-glycerol-water (UGLH, 1:1:2, molar ratio), and choline chloride-2,3-butanediol (ChClBt, 1:4, molar ratio), were systematically optimized. Rotating agitation for 10 min yielded the highest overall recoveries and was therefore selected as the optimal extraction time. Rotary shaking was chosen over sonication due to its superior performance across both simple and complex matrices. Among the NADES tested, UGLH proved to be the most effective composition for the honey matrix. The analytical method was validated for the honey matrix. Linearity showed excellent performance across the tested concentration range, with R<sup>2</sup> values above 0.95 for all analytes. Matrix effects were within ±20% for nearly half of the compounds, while a few exhibited moderate matrix enhancement. Recoveries ranged from 50.1% to 120.5% at 500 µg/kg and 1000 µg/kg, demonstrating acceptable extraction performance. Intra-day and inter-day precision showed relative standard deviations (RSDs) below 20% for most analytes. Limits of quantification (LOQs) were established at 500 µg/kg for eight compounds based on recovery and precision criteria. These results confirm the suitability of the proposed NADES-based method for sensitive and reliable analysis of biopesticide residues in honey. When compared to conventional extraction methods, the proposed NADES-based protocol proved to be a greener alternative, achieving the highest AGREEprep score due to its use of non-toxic solvents, lower waste generation, and overall sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14193438
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green Extraction and Targeted LC-MS Analysis of Biopesticides in Honey Using Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents

Asiah Nusaibah Masri, Antonia Garrido Frenich, Alba Reyes-Ávila, Laura Carbonell‐Rozas et al.
3 citations
Foods
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
3.49
article

Green Extraction and Targeted LC-MS Analysis of Biopesticides in Honey Using Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents

Asiah Nusaibah Masri, Antonia Garrido Frenich, Alba Reyes-Ávila, Laura Carbonell‐Rozas, Theaveraj Ravi, Roberto Romero‐González
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADES) were synthesized from food-grade components and evaluated as green extractants for the simultaneous recovery and liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (LC-Q-Orbitrap-MS) analysis of biopesticide residues in a complex matrix like honey. Conventional solid-liquid extraction (SLE) was applied, initially using choline chloride-2,3-butanediol (1:4, molar ratio) as the NADES extractant solvent, before systematically evaluating other NADES formulations. Extraction parameters, such as time (10 min, 20 min, and 30 min), technique (rotary mixing vs. sonication), and NADES composition, namely lactic acid-glucose-water (LGH, 5:1:9, molar ratio), lactic acid-glycerol-water (LGLH, 1:1:3, molar ratio), urea-glycerol-water (UGLH, 1:1:2, molar ratio), and choline chloride-2,3-butanediol (ChClBt, 1:4, molar ratio), were systematically optimized. Rotating agitation for 10 min yielded the highest overall recoveries and was therefore selected as the optimal extraction time. Rotary shaking was chosen over sonication due to its superior performance across both simple and complex matrices. Among the NADES tested, UGLH proved to be the most effective composition for the honey matrix. The analytical method was validated for the honey matrix. Linearity showed excellent performance across the tested concentration range, with R<sup>2</sup> values above 0.95 for all analytes. Matrix effects were within ±20% for nearly half of the compounds, while a few exhibited moderate matrix enhancement. Recoveries ranged from 50.1% to 120.5% at 500 µg/kg and 1000 µg/kg, demonstrating acceptable extraction performance. Intra-day and inter-day precision showed relative standard deviations (RSDs) below 20% for most analytes. Limits of quantification (LOQs) were established at 500 µg/kg for eight compounds based on recovery and precision criteria. These results confirm the suitability of the proposed NADES-based method for sensitive and reliable analysis of biopesticide residues in honey. When compared to conventional extraction methods, the proposed NADES-based protocol proved to be a greener alternative, achieving the highest AGREEprep score due to its use of non-toxic solvents, lower waste generation, and overall sustainability.

FoodsVol. 14(19)
University of Technology Malaysia (MY), University of Almería (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.