Judgment of crowds as emotional increases with the proportion of black faces

Decades of research have sought to characterize how racialization affects the evaluation of faces. However, research has mostly focused on the perception of single faces. In the current project we address this gap by examining whether racialization affects crowd perception, even in the absence of perceived differences at the single-face level. In Experiments 1-2, participants viewed crowds of faces expressing different degrees of happiness or anger and different ratios of lighter-skinned faces (racialized as White) and darker-skinned faces (racialized as black). A higher proportion of Black faces led to a greater likelihood of perceiving the crowd as emotional. Experiment 3 confirmed this effect was not solely driven by the contrast between White and Black faces within a crowd, as crowds composed of entirely Black faces were more likely to be evaluated as emotional than crowds of White and Black faces. Using hierarchical drift diffusion models, we compared potential mechanisms and found that Black faces expressing emotions weighed more heavily than White faces in judging whether a crowd was emotional. These results shed light on an important way in which racialization impacts judgments of collective emotion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95029-3
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judgment of crowds as emotional increases with the proportion of black faces

Erika Weisz, Mina Cikara, Amit Goldenberg, Zi Huang et al.
Scientific Reports
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

Judgment of crowds as emotional increases with the proportion of black faces

Erika Weisz, Mina Cikara, Amit Goldenberg, Zi Huang, Kyle J. LaFollette
article en

Abstract

Decades of research have sought to characterize how racialization affects the evaluation of faces. However, research has mostly focused on the perception of single faces. In the current project we address this gap by examining whether racialization affects crowd perception, even in the absence of perceived differences at the single-face level. In Experiments 1-2, participants viewed crowds of faces expressing different degrees of happiness or anger and different ratios of lighter-skinned faces (racialized as White) and darker-skinned faces (racialized as black). A higher proportion of Black faces led to a greater likelihood of perceiving the crowd as emotional. Experiment 3 confirmed this effect was not solely driven by the contrast between White and Black faces within a crowd, as crowds composed of entirely Black faces were more likely to be evaluated as emotional than crowds of White and Black faces. Using hierarchical drift diffusion models, we compared potential mechanisms and found that Black faces expressing emotions weighed more heavily than White faces in judging whether a crowd was emotional. These results shed light on an important way in which racialization impacts judgments of collective emotion.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Union Bank of Switzerland (CH), Harvard University (US), Harvard University Press (US), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.