Can we quickly calculate reliable earthquake parameters from citizen testimonies?

Abstract In a recent work, we tested the ability to compute earthquake parameters (location and magnitude) using citizen testimonies collected by the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC). Each intensity estimated by individual non-professional users of the LastQuake smartphone application is indicated as an individual data point (IDP). Each IDP is archived by EMSC with a time stamp, allowing the calculation of the time delay from the earthquake origin time. To use IDPs as classic intensities, i.e. macroseismic data points (MDPs), identifying damage at the scale of towns or cities, they must be grouped into spatial clusters, which are then processed by the BOXER code to locate and size global earthquakes. A retrospective analysis on a dataset of more than 15,000 events collected over the past 10 years shows that the procedure can provide reliable parameters and that the results depend on the geographical area and improve over time and as the number of available IDPs/MDPs increases. The key question is whether early IDPs/MDPs can quickly provide reliable parameters (location and magnitude) for users and stakeholders (e.g. the civil protection agencies). Using clustering methods that statistically provide, on average, the best agreement with instrumental data, we tested some predefined time intervals within which to group the available IDPs into MDPs. We then applied the BOXER code to these MDPs, evaluating the agreement with the final instrumental parameters. Results confirm that reliability increases with the number and distribution of MDPs, strictly dependent on the number and distribution of available IDPs. This retrospective analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach and its potential to quickly provide parameters for future real-time applications. The method may offer a reliable and rapid tool to support emergency response, improving as more IDPs/MDPs are collected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02299-3
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can we quickly calculate reliable earthquake parameters from citizen testimonies?

Matthieu Landès, Gianfranco Vannucci, Paolo Gasperini, Rémy Bossu
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Can we quickly calculate reliable earthquake parameters from citizen testimonies?

Matthieu Landès, Gianfranco Vannucci, Paolo Gasperini, Rémy Bossu
article en

Abstract

Abstract In a recent work, we tested the ability to compute earthquake parameters (location and magnitude) using citizen testimonies collected by the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC). Each intensity estimated by individual non-professional users of the LastQuake smartphone application is indicated as an individual data point (IDP). Each IDP is archived by EMSC with a time stamp, allowing the calculation of the time delay from the earthquake origin time. To use IDPs as classic intensities, i.e. macroseismic data points (MDPs), identifying damage at the scale of towns or cities, they must be grouped into spatial clusters, which are then processed by the BOXER code to locate and size global earthquakes. A retrospective analysis on a dataset of more than 15,000 events collected over the past 10 years shows that the procedure can provide reliable parameters and that the results depend on the geographical area and improve over time and as the number of available IDPs/MDPs increases. The key question is whether early IDPs/MDPs can quickly provide reliable parameters (location and magnitude) for users and stakeholders (e.g. the civil protection agencies). Using clustering methods that statistically provide, on average, the best agreement with instrumental data, we tested some predefined time intervals within which to group the available IDPs into MDPs. We then applied the BOXER code to these MDPs, evaluating the agreement with the final instrumental parameters. Results confirm that reliability increases with the number and distribution of MDPs, strictly dependent on the number and distribution of available IDPs. This retrospective analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach and its potential to quickly provide parameters for future real-time applications. The method may offer a reliable and rapid tool to support emergency response, improving as more IDPs/MDPs are collected.

Bulletin of Earthquake EngineeringVol. 23(15)
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (FR), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT), CEA DAM Île-de-France (FR), University of Bologna (IT)
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Fondation MAIF, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.