Asynchronous Majority Dynamics on Binomial Random Graphs

We study information aggregation in networks when agents interact to learn a binary state of the world. Initially each agent privately observes an independent signal which is correct with probability \(\frac{1}{2}+\delta\) for some δ > 0. At each round, a node is selected uniformly at random to update their public opinion to match the majority of their neighbours (breaking ties in favour of their initial private signal). Our main result shows that for sparse and connected binomial random graphs \({\mathcal {G}}(n,p)\) the process stabilizes in a correct consensus in \(\mathcal {O}(n\log ^2 n/\log \log n)\) steps with high probability. In fact, when \(\log n/n \ll p = o(1)\) the process terminates at time \(\hat{T} = (1+o(1))n\log n\) , where \(\hat{T}\) is the first time when all nodes have been selected at least once. However, in dense binomial random graphs with p = Ω (1), there is an information cascade where the process terminates in the incorrect consensus with probability bounded away from zero.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3771091
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asynchronous Majority Dynamics on Binomial Random Graphs

Divyarthi Mohan, Paweł Prałat
ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
article

Asynchronous Majority Dynamics on Binomial Random Graphs

Divyarthi Mohan, Paweł Prałat
article en

Abstract

We study information aggregation in networks when agents interact to learn a binary state of the world. Initially each agent privately observes an independent signal which is correct with probability \(\frac{1}{2}+\delta\) for some δ > 0. At each round, a node is selected uniformly at random to update their public opinion to match the majority of their neighbours (breaking ties in favour of their initial private signal). Our main result shows that for sparse and connected binomial random graphs \({\mathcal {G}}(n,p)\) the process stabilizes in a correct consensus in \(\mathcal {O}(n\log ^2 n/\log \log n)\) steps with high probability. In fact, when \(\log n/n \ll p = o(1)\) the process terminates at time \(\hat{T} = (1+o(1))n\log n\) , where \(\hat{T}\) is the first time when all nodes have been selected at least once. However, in dense binomial random graphs with p = Ω (1), there is an information cascade where the process terminates in the incorrect consensus with probability bounded away from zero.

ACM Transactions on Economics and ComputationVol. 13(4)
Boston University (US), Tel Aviv University (IL), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.