Evaluating AI‐Generated Meal Plans for Simulated Diabetes Profiles: A Guideline‐Based Comparison of Three Language Models

While LLMs showed promise in generating baseline dietary guidance in a simulated context, these results reflected concordance with guideline documents only and concordance with guideline documents only and should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence to dietitian-led care. These findings reflected model behaviour in synthetic scenarios only and highlighted the need for RAG integration and expert supervision before any clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70295
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating AI‐Generated Meal Plans for Simulated Diabetes Profiles: A Guideline‐Based Comparison of Three Language Models

Hati̇ce Merve Bayram, Sedat Arslan, Arda Öztürkcan
2 citations
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Diet and metabolism studies
2.33
article

Evaluating AI‐Generated Meal Plans for Simulated Diabetes Profiles: A Guideline‐Based Comparison of Three Language Models

Hati̇ce Merve Bayram, Sedat Arslan, Arda Öztürkcan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While LLMs showed promise in generating baseline dietary guidance in a simulated context, these results reflected concordance with guideline documents only and concordance with guideline documents only and should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence to dietitian-led care. These findings reflected model behaviour in synthetic scenarios only and highlighted the need for RAG integration and expert supervision before any clinical application.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeVol. 31(7)
Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University (TR), İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diet and metabolism studies
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.