Psychometric Evaluation of the Korean Social Health Scale for the Elderly: A Rasch Analysis of Item Level Validity

All domains of the K-SHSE demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties for assessing social health among older adults in Korea, with particularly strong performance in the SS domain. Although some items exhibited DIF or showed limited reliability, their inclusion did not bias the measurement model. These findings support the use of the K-SHSE as a valid and reliable tool for evaluating social health in both research and practical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70275
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Korean Social Health Scale for the Elderly: A Rasch Analysis of Item Level Validity

Seungju Lim, Yebin Han, Ji‐Hyuk Park
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Health and Wellbeing Research
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Korean Social Health Scale for the Elderly: A Rasch Analysis of Item Level Validity

Seungju Lim, Yebin Han, Ji‐Hyuk Park
article en

Abstract

All domains of the K-SHSE demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties for assessing social health among older adults in Korea, with particularly strong performance in the SS domain. Although some items exhibited DIF or showed limited reliability, their inclusion did not bias the measurement model. These findings support the use of the K-SHSE as a valid and reliable tool for evaluating social health in both research and practical settings.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeVol. 31(7)
Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Health and Wellbeing Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.