Development and Validation of Photonumeric Scales for Glabellar, Lateral Canthal, and Forehead Lines

Abstract Background Upper facial lines are early signs of aging that impact self-image, underscoring the need for objective, evidence-based tools to support the growing demand for aesthetic interventions. Objectives The authors of this study aim to develop and validate 4-point photonumeric scales for clinical assessment of glabellar, lateral canthal, and forehead lines at rest and dynamic expression, and evaluate their clinical relevance and alignment with patient-reported perceptions of wrinkle severity. Methods Six 4-point photonumeric scales were developed to assess glabellar, lateral canthal, and forehead lines at rest and during maximum expression. Validation was conducted by 5 board-certified physicians over 2 live rating sessions, spaced at least 2 weeks apart. Participants (n = 96-114 per scale) reflected a diverse range of ages, sexes, and Fitzpatrick skin types. Intrarater and interrater reliability were evaluated using weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Correlation with participant self-assessments and the Facial Line Distress Scale (FINE) assessed patient alignment. Clinical relevance was confirmed through physician rating of image pairs with known score differences. Results All scales demonstrated high intrarater (mean κ = 0.83-0.91) and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.94-0.98), indicating “almost-perfect” agreement. FINE scores showed a strong correlation with physician and participant scale ratings. Clinically meaningful 1-grade score differences were supported by nonoverlapping 95% CIs between image pairs rated as clinically different and not clinically different, with statistically significant mean differences exceeding 1 point. Conclusions The validated scales demonstrated high reliability, clinical relevance, and strong alignment with patient-reported outcomes, supporting their use as objective tools for clinical assessment. Level of Evidence: 5 (Therapeutic)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf124
Primary Topic
Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of Photonumeric Scales for Glabellar, Lateral Canthal, and Forehead Lines

Lawrence S. Bass, Derek Jones, Amir Moradi, Jason D. Bloom et al.
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
article

Development and Validation of Photonumeric Scales for Glabellar, Lateral Canthal, and Forehead Lines

Lawrence S. Bass, Derek Jones, Amir Moradi, Jason D. Bloom, Jeanine B. Downie, Wooshun Lee, Stacy Smith, Z. Paul Lorenc, Seolhui Go
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Upper facial lines are early signs of aging that impact self-image, underscoring the need for objective, evidence-based tools to support the growing demand for aesthetic interventions. Objectives The authors of this study aim to develop and validate 4-point photonumeric scales for clinical assessment of glabellar, lateral canthal, and forehead lines at rest and dynamic expression, and evaluate their clinical relevance and alignment with patient-reported perceptions of wrinkle severity. Methods Six 4-point photonumeric scales were developed to assess glabellar, lateral canthal, and forehead lines at rest and during maximum expression. Validation was conducted by 5 board-certified physicians over 2 live rating sessions, spaced at least 2 weeks apart. Participants (n = 96-114 per scale) reflected a diverse range of ages, sexes, and Fitzpatrick skin types. Intrarater and interrater reliability were evaluated using weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Correlation with participant self-assessments and the Facial Line Distress Scale (FINE) assessed patient alignment. Clinical relevance was confirmed through physician rating of image pairs with known score differences. Results All scales demonstrated high intrarater (mean κ = 0.83-0.91) and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.94-0.98), indicating “almost-perfect” agreement. FINE scores showed a strong correlation with physician and participant scale ratings. Clinically meaningful 1-grade score differences were supported by nonoverlapping 95% CIs between image pairs rated as clinically different and not clinically different, with statistically significant mean differences exceeding 1 point. Conclusions The validated scales demonstrated high reliability, clinical relevance, and strong alignment with patient-reported outcomes, supporting their use as objective tools for clinical assessment. Level of Evidence: 5 (Therapeutic)

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open ForumVol. 7
Bryn Mawr College (US), Hofstra University (US), Overlook Medical Center (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Clinical Innovations (United States) (US), Beverly Hills Cardiology (US), Incyte (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.