On facts concerning scientific research: responding to the crisis of legitimacy of science

In this paper, we deal with the issue of the spreading decline of trust in science. The scope of our work is to address the problem by showing the limits of the current way of coping with it. We propose a more comprehensive historical and philosophical contextualization. Accordingly, we suggest that the increased uneasiness often lamented by the scientific community can be read as the symptom of the periodical crisis of legitimation that precedes important epistemological changes. Rather than protecting the authority of scientific knowledge by increasing its autonomy and independence, we suggest that trust might be regained by adapting the practices to the significant transformations that our societies need and will undergo. In order to contribute to the emerging discussions on the topic, we propose some leads and advocate a call to establish more transdisciplinary communities working towards a more collaborative, transparent and communicative science for all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05786-9
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On facts concerning scientific research: responding to the crisis of legitimacy of science

Anna Longo, Rebecca L. Volpe, G. Viola
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

On facts concerning scientific research: responding to the crisis of legitimacy of science

Anna Longo, Rebecca L. Volpe, G. Viola
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with the issue of the spreading decline of trust in science. The scope of our work is to address the problem by showing the limits of the current way of coping with it. We propose a more comprehensive historical and philosophical contextualization. Accordingly, we suggest that the increased uneasiness often lamented by the scientific community can be read as the symptom of the periodical crisis of legitimation that precedes important epistemological changes. Rather than protecting the authority of scientific knowledge by increasing its autonomy and independence, we suggest that trust might be regained by adapting the practices to the significant transformations that our societies need and will undergo. In order to contribute to the emerging discussions on the topic, we propose some leads and advocate a call to establish more transdisciplinary communities working towards a more collaborative, transparent and communicative science for all.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Université Paris Cité (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.