NEW NARRATIVES OF STALIN MYTH

Introduction. The article contains the results of the analysis of the specifics of the mythologization of the image of I. V. Stalin in the context of modern ideological and religious issues. The author postulates that the modern Stalin’s myth at the structural level goes back to the Soviet ideological discourse of the 30-50 s. of the twentieth century, but at the semantic level is a fundamentally new phenomenon. Modern mythologization of the image of Stalin, in contrast to the Soviet one, is aimed at "privatizing" his image and attempting to fit it into a new context in which he appears as not only a political, but also a sacred figure. This is ensured by reference to such concepts as "Eurasianism", "communality" and "the chosenness of the Russian people". Content. The modern "Orthodox" interpretation of the image of Stalin has led to the emergence of a corpus of narratives in which Stalin appears as a secret Orthodox Christian and even a hero of the faith. Under the guise of an orthodox Marxist and atheist was hidden a deeply religious man who was blessed by some elders to fight against the enemies of Russia - "the Jews". The discourse records claim that Stalin was secretly ordained to the priesthood and took monastic vows, was the actual successor to the tsarist power and the creator of conditions for the restoration of the monarchy in the future. At the same time, attempts are recorded to interpret Stalin in the context of the neo-pagan semiosphere. In these cases, Stalin is understood as a sacred figure of neo-pagan and (or) esoteric discourse, possessing supernatural powers, priestly or shamanic initiation. To substantiate these claims, both reinterpreted biographical data and appeals to the logic of the conspiracy myth are used. Conclusions. A comparative analysis of the narratives allows us to conclude that the formation of the mythological complex “Stalin is a pagan sorcerer/priest” is formed as an inversion of the corresponding pseudo-Orthodox mythology and is pragmatically aimed at solving similar goals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35231/18186653_2025_3_194
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NEW NARRATIVES OF STALIN MYTH

Aleksandr Priluckij
Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal
Soviet and Russian History
article

NEW NARRATIVES OF STALIN MYTH

Aleksandr Priluckij
article en

Abstract

Introduction. The article contains the results of the analysis of the specifics of the mythologization of the image of I. V. Stalin in the context of modern ideological and religious issues. The author postulates that the modern Stalin’s myth at the structural level goes back to the Soviet ideological discourse of the 30-50 s. of the twentieth century, but at the semantic level is a fundamentally new phenomenon. Modern mythologization of the image of Stalin, in contrast to the Soviet one, is aimed at "privatizing" his image and attempting to fit it into a new context in which he appears as not only a political, but also a sacred figure. This is ensured by reference to such concepts as "Eurasianism", "communality" and "the chosenness of the Russian people". Content. The modern "Orthodox" interpretation of the image of Stalin has led to the emergence of a corpus of narratives in which Stalin appears as a secret Orthodox Christian and even a hero of the faith. Under the guise of an orthodox Marxist and atheist was hidden a deeply religious man who was blessed by some elders to fight against the enemies of Russia - "the Jews". The discourse records claim that Stalin was secretly ordained to the priesthood and took monastic vows, was the actual successor to the tsarist power and the creator of conditions for the restoration of the monarchy in the future. At the same time, attempts are recorded to interpret Stalin in the context of the neo-pagan semiosphere. In these cases, Stalin is understood as a sacred figure of neo-pagan and (or) esoteric discourse, possessing supernatural powers, priestly or shamanic initiation. To substantiate these claims, both reinterpreted biographical data and appeals to the logic of the conspiracy myth are used. Conclusions. A comparative analysis of the narratives allows us to conclude that the formation of the mythological complex “Stalin is a pagan sorcerer/priest” is formed as an inversion of the corresponding pseudo-Orthodox mythology and is pragmatically aimed at solving similar goals.

Pushkin Leningrad State University JournalVol. 3
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

NEW NARRATIVES OF STALIN MYTH — Aleksandr Priluckij · Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS