The Reform of the Finnish Court Fees Act – Were the Societal Functions of the Administrative Courts and Access to Justice Jeopardized?

Finland implemented a reform of court fees in 2015 (1455/2015), almost doubling the costs of certain proceedings and assigning fees to others that were previously free of charge. The objectives of the reform were to increase legal certainty, improve the cost coverage of fees, reduce the manifestly unjustified use of court services, ensure a reasonable relationship between court fees and the costs of different court proceedings, and achieve a simpler and clearer court fee system. An impact assessment of the reform was performed in 2022–2023, and it confirmed that the objectives had largely been met. However, the reform had an unforeseen negative effect: the societal functions of the courts were no longer being fulfilled adequately, jeopardizing everyone’s right to a fair trial, more precisely the right of access to court, as guaranteed by Article 6 of the European Human Rights Convention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Court Administration
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.632
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Reform of the Finnish Court Fees Act – Were the Societal Functions of the Administrative Courts and Access to Justice Jeopardized?

Laura Tammenlehto, Mika Launiala
International Journal for Court Administration
European and International Law Studies
article

The Reform of the Finnish Court Fees Act – Were the Societal Functions of the Administrative Courts and Access to Justice Jeopardized?

Laura Tammenlehto, Mika Launiala
article en

Abstract

Finland implemented a reform of court fees in 2015 (1455/2015), almost doubling the costs of certain proceedings and assigning fees to others that were previously free of charge. The objectives of the reform were to increase legal certainty, improve the cost coverage of fees, reduce the manifestly unjustified use of court services, ensure a reasonable relationship between court fees and the costs of different court proceedings, and achieve a simpler and clearer court fee system. An impact assessment of the reform was performed in 2022–2023, and it confirmed that the objectives had largely been met. However, the reform had an unforeseen negative effect: the societal functions of the courts were no longer being fulfilled adequately, jeopardizing everyone’s right to a fair trial, more precisely the right of access to court, as guaranteed by Article 6 of the European Human Rights Convention.

International Journal for Court AdministrationVol. 16(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.