Investigation into the adaptability of different elastoplastic models for fields to launch impact loading

This study establishes a coupled finite element model of the adaptive pedestal and low specific pressure field. By comparing the dynamic response of compacted loess under launch impact loading using the Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) model and linear Drucker-Prager (D-P) model, the applicability of different constitutive models is investigated. The analysis reveals that the M-C model predicts a maximum settlement of 206.3 mm and a peak shear stress of 0.2 MPa, accurately capturing the formation of shallow shear bands. This demonstrates its superior suitability for studying the coupled dynamic response between the adaptive pedestal and low specific pressure field. In contrast, the D-P model better describes the deep soil response but underestimates shallow shear deformation, with a reduced peak shear stress of 0.18 MPa, and is more suitable for the overall stress state analysis of soil under high confining pressure. These findings provide critical insights into constitutive model selection for simulating soil-field interactions under impact loading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757110.3757124
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation into the adaptability of different elastoplastic models for fields to launch impact loading

Xiaoguang Yang, Huiguo Qin, Tianran Hou
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Investigation into the adaptability of different elastoplastic models for fields to launch impact loading

Xiaoguang Yang, Huiguo Qin, Tianran Hou
article en

Abstract

This study establishes a coupled finite element model of the adaptive pedestal and low specific pressure field. By comparing the dynamic response of compacted loess under launch impact loading using the Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) model and linear Drucker-Prager (D-P) model, the applicability of different constitutive models is investigated. The analysis reveals that the M-C model predicts a maximum settlement of 206.3 mm and a peak shear stress of 0.2 MPa, accurately capturing the formation of shallow shear bands. This demonstrates its superior suitability for studying the coupled dynamic response between the adaptive pedestal and low specific pressure field. In contrast, the D-P model better describes the deep soil response but underestimates shallow shear deformation, with a reduced peak shear stress of 0.18 MPa, and is more suitable for the overall stress state analysis of soil under high confining pressure. These findings provide critical insights into constitutive model selection for simulating soil-field interactions under impact loading.

Beijing Research Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.