Why did Generation Z choose engineering-related courses? A conjoint analysis approach

Engineering plays a critical role in driving industrialization, advancing technology, and sustaining national development, yet interest in engineering careers among Generation Z has shown a troubling decline worldwide. Understanding how this cohort makes educational and career choices is essential for strengthening the future engineering workforce. The purpose of this study was to quantify how Generation Z students evaluate competing attributes when selecting engineering-related courses. Using a fractional-factorial conjoint design (16 profiles; 7-point ratings), a survey of 500 first-year engineering students in the Philippines estimated part-worth utilities and attribute importance for six factors: tuition fees, expected salary, employability, and recommendations from teachers, peers, and relatives. Conjoint estimates revealed a clear hierarchy of preferences: expected salary was the most influential attribute, followed by tuition fees and teacher recommendations; employability exerted a moderate effect, while endorsements from peers and relatives were weakest. Framed by Expectancy-Value, Social Influence, and Self-Efficacy theories, the results indicate that Gen Z enrollment decisions are primarily value-driven (costs vs. returns) and reinforced by credible authority signals from teachers rather than normative pressures from family or friends. Methodologically, the study demonstrates the utility of conjoint analysis for uncovering implicit trade-offs in high-stakes educational choices, translating psychological constructs into measurable preference structures. Practically, the findings highlight strategic levers for policymakers and institutions: aligning tuition policies with affordability concerns, providing transparent information on career outcomes, strengthening teacher mentorship, and enhancing employability pathways. These insights contribute to both educational policy and psychological research on decision-making among Generation Z.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105691
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Generational Differences and Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why did Generation Z choose engineering-related courses? A conjoint analysis approach

Zachariah John A. Belmonte, Yogi Tri Prasetyo, Reny Nadlifatin, Maela Madel L. Cahigas et al.
1 citations
Acta Psychologica
Generational Differences and Trends
4.78
article

Why did Generation Z choose engineering-related courses? A conjoint analysis approach

Zachariah John A. Belmonte, Yogi Tri Prasetyo, Reny Nadlifatin, Maela Madel L. Cahigas, Edison Martinez Esberto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Engineering plays a critical role in driving industrialization, advancing technology, and sustaining national development, yet interest in engineering careers among Generation Z has shown a troubling decline worldwide. Understanding how this cohort makes educational and career choices is essential for strengthening the future engineering workforce. The purpose of this study was to quantify how Generation Z students evaluate competing attributes when selecting engineering-related courses. Using a fractional-factorial conjoint design (16 profiles; 7-point ratings), a survey of 500 first-year engineering students in the Philippines estimated part-worth utilities and attribute importance for six factors: tuition fees, expected salary, employability, and recommendations from teachers, peers, and relatives. Conjoint estimates revealed a clear hierarchy of preferences: expected salary was the most influential attribute, followed by tuition fees and teacher recommendations; employability exerted a moderate effect, while endorsements from peers and relatives were weakest. Framed by Expectancy-Value, Social Influence, and Self-Efficacy theories, the results indicate that Gen Z enrollment decisions are primarily value-driven (costs vs. returns) and reinforced by credible authority signals from teachers rather than normative pressures from family or friends. Methodologically, the study demonstrates the utility of conjoint analysis for uncovering implicit trade-offs in high-stakes educational choices, translating psychological constructs into measurable preference structures. Practically, the findings highlight strategic levers for policymakers and institutions: aligning tuition policies with affordability concerns, providing transparent information on career outcomes, strengthening teacher mentorship, and enhancing employability pathways. These insights contribute to both educational policy and psychological research on decision-making among Generation Z.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 260
Mapúa University (PH), Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology (ID), Technological University of the Philippines (PH), University of the Philippines Manila (PH), Yuan Ze University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Generational Differences and Trends
4.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.