Neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 2 trial

Patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) frequently require mutilating surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). CSCC has been demonstrated to be highly responsive to neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB). However, efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 are lacking. In the MATISSE trial, the primary objective was met to investigate the pathological response rate on neoadjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) at the time of standard of care (SOC: surgery ± RT), defined as the proportion of remaining viable tumor cells in the surgical specimen. Fifty patients with stage I-IVa resectable CSCC were treated with NIVO (weeks 0 and 2) or NIVO (weeks 0 and 2) plus low-dose IPI (week 0) before SOC in week 4. The median follow-up was 31 months. Forty patients underwent SOC; 9 of 20 (45%) patients who received NIVO and 10 of 20 (50%) patients who received NIVO + IPI reached a major pathological response (MPR) and 2 of 20 (10%) patients with NIVO and 6 of 20 (30%) with NIVO + IPI reached a partial pathological response (PPR), resulting in pathological response rates of 55% and 80%, respectively. MPR or PPR was accompanied by 2-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of 100%. ICB was safe with 12% (NIVO) and 8% (NIVO + IPI), grade 3, immune-related toxicity without surgical delays. Ten patients opted to decline surgery and RT, of whom nine reached durable organ preservation and a clinical complete remission on two ICB infusions alone, accompanied by a 2-year DSS of 100% and favorable health-related quality of life. Early changes in [<sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography's total lesion glycolysis can safely select patients for response-guided treatment de-escalation in future trials. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is: NCT04620200 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Medicine
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03943-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 2 trial

Ton N. Schumacher, Michiel W. M. van den Brekel, Daniela S. Thommen, John B.A.G. Haanen et al.
3 citations
Nature Medicine
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
4.06
article

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 2 trial

Ton N. Schumacher, Michiel W. M. van den Brekel, Daniela S. Thommen, John B.A.G. Haanen, L.H.E. Karssemakers, Elsemieke I. Plasmeijer, Maurits Wondergem, Lonneke V. van de Poll‐Franse, Barış Karakullukçu, Wouter V. Vogel, Annegien Broeks, Willem Hans Schreuder, Joris L. Vos, Joleen J.H. Traets, Itske Fraterman, Thomas Boere, Vincent van der Noort, Sten Cornelissen, Laura A. Smit, Petra K. de Koekkoek‐Doll, Arash Navran, Peter J. F. M. Lohuis, Bram Westerink, Charlotte L. Zuur, Jonas A. Castelijns, Hedda J. van der Hulst, Winan J. van Houdt, W. Martin C. Klop, Jan Paul de Boer, Suzanne Onderwater, Bernard M. Tijink, Richard Dirven, Fons J. M. Balm, Sabine E. Breukers, Francesco Missale, Ludi E. Smeele, Lot A. Devriese, Christian U. Blank, Remco de Bree, Valesca P. Retèl, Robert D. Crommelin, Alexandra G. L. Toppenberg, Stan W. van Dijk, Xiaohang Qiao, Anke Kuijpers, Martijn van der Heijden, M. Ostos, Lilly‐Ann van der Velden, Esther Maas-Bannink
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) frequently require mutilating surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). CSCC has been demonstrated to be highly responsive to neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB). However, efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 are lacking. In the MATISSE trial, the primary objective was met to investigate the pathological response rate on neoadjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) at the time of standard of care (SOC: surgery ± RT), defined as the proportion of remaining viable tumor cells in the surgical specimen. Fifty patients with stage I-IVa resectable CSCC were treated with NIVO (weeks 0 and 2) or NIVO (weeks 0 and 2) plus low-dose IPI (week 0) before SOC in week 4. The median follow-up was 31 months. Forty patients underwent SOC; 9 of 20 (45%) patients who received NIVO and 10 of 20 (50%) patients who received NIVO + IPI reached a major pathological response (MPR) and 2 of 20 (10%) patients with NIVO and 6 of 20 (30%) with NIVO + IPI reached a partial pathological response (PPR), resulting in pathological response rates of 55% and 80%, respectively. MPR or PPR was accompanied by 2-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of 100%. ICB was safe with 12% (NIVO) and 8% (NIVO + IPI), grade 3, immune-related toxicity without surgical delays. Ten patients opted to decline surgery and RT, of whom nine reached durable organ preservation and a clinical complete remission on two ICB infusions alone, accompanied by a 2-year DSS of 100% and favorable health-related quality of life. Early changes in [<sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography's total lesion glycolysis can safely select patients for response-guided treatment de-escalation in future trials. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is: NCT04620200 .

Nature MedicineVol. 31(12)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Utrecht University (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Oncode Institute (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Regensburg (DE), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, American Society of Clinical Oncology
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
4.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.