Science and Public Health in the Trump Era: The Dismantling of Evidence and Institutions, and Proposals for Reconstruction

This article addresses the unprecedented politicization of science and health institutions, which threatens the functional integrity of democratic governance itself. Regulatory measures have weakened the infrastructure for evidence generation, constrained the autonomy of scientific actors, and subordinated public health priorities to cultural grievance and political loyalty. False and misleading information about core scientific knowledge is amplified not only in social media but also by government itself. Disinvestment from the National Institutes of Health, advisory body sidelining, and public rhetoric casting science as elite overreach have together eroded the credibility of United States health leadership both domestically and abroad. Moreover, targeting policies in research portfolios designed to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion jeopardizes both representational justice and the innovation capacity of American science at large. This article traces the historical and political structure of science-politics confrontations and details the damage to the public health and research ecosystem. It offers proposals to reconstruct the scientific enterprise in the next presidential administration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-12262640
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science and Public Health in the Trump Era: The Dismantling of Evidence and Institutions, and Proposals for Reconstruction

John D. Kraemer, Sam Halabi, Lawrence O. Gostin, Kayla Wontumi et al.
2 citations
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
Public Health Policies and Education
5.63
article

Science and Public Health in the Trump Era: The Dismantling of Evidence and Institutions, and Proposals for Reconstruction

John D. Kraemer, Sam Halabi, Lawrence O. Gostin, Kayla Wontumi, Anjola Tega
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article addresses the unprecedented politicization of science and health institutions, which threatens the functional integrity of democratic governance itself. Regulatory measures have weakened the infrastructure for evidence generation, constrained the autonomy of scientific actors, and subordinated public health priorities to cultural grievance and political loyalty. False and misleading information about core scientific knowledge is amplified not only in social media but also by government itself. Disinvestment from the National Institutes of Health, advisory body sidelining, and public rhetoric casting science as elite overreach have together eroded the credibility of United States health leadership both domestically and abroad. Moreover, targeting policies in research portfolios designed to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion jeopardizes both representational justice and the innovation capacity of American science at large. This article traces the historical and political structure of science-politics confrontations and details the damage to the public health and research ecosystem. It offers proposals to reconstruct the scientific enterprise in the next presidential administration.

Journal of Health Politics Policy and LawVol. 51(2)
Georgetown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Health Policies and Education
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.